[dev1077] What's the point in Tonko: Ni?

[Alhanelem]

Cause Tonki: Ni lasts significantly longer >_>?

If you need sneak too, then you gain nothing from the longer duration because you need to remove the invis manually to recast sneak.

[Babekeke]

If you need sneak too, then you gain nothing from the longer duration because you need to remove the invis manually to recast sneak.

This.
I assumed that there would be a longer duration, but the fact of monomi still being ichi meant it was a moot point unless you only need invis, which is rare.

Edit: not to mention that with the update to the duration of enhancing magic sneak/invis being vastly increased, Monomi: Ni makes perfect sense.

[Vold]

If you need sneak too, then you gain nothing from the longer duration because you need to remove the invis manually to recast sneak.

Well, that's why they call it "if"

There have been rare times where I needed to use tonki ichi seconds after using ni. I'll take this change to ensure in the future my mistakes are less likely to be taken advantage of by monsters. Why they couldn't have just added the bloody Ni versions, is beyond my ability to comprehend at this point.

THEY COULD HAVE MF'ING GIVEN US THIS FOR JUB ICHI SINCE IT SEEMS IT WOULD DESTROY THE BALANCE IN THE FORCE TO GIVE US NI SPELLS.

[Karbuncle]

If you need sneak too, then you gain nothing from the longer duration because you need to remove the invis manually to recast sneak.

If being the key word. Been plenty of places/times I've needed just tonko :X

[Babekeke]

If being the key word. Been plenty of places/times I've needed just tonko :X

I can think of far more where I've only needed sneak, and many more where I've needed both.

Since the case for my rant is that they should have given us Monomi: Ni instead of shortening the cast times on :ichi, I feel it's a valid point. Both would be great, but this just seems like a cop out for giving us Monomi: Ni.