A fair point, but it only brings up an equally distressing problem. Those of us here who understand how Defense works have been fairly consistent in our evaluation of the usefulness of this roll and Defense as a stat with the current limitations in place on player characters (namely 1.0 lower bound on monster cRatio). We've brought up very specific problems that arise when using Defense at all, namely:
- Lower bound on cRatio causes players to quickly "tap out" or plateau in terms of damage mitigation from defense
- High attack values on notorious monsters make Defense worthless without extreme stacking as the gains from defense at high monster cRatio are minimal at best.
The Defense vs Damage Mitigation curve for players is an exponential curve, as opposed to the logarithmic curve used by Attack vs Damage dealt. This means that Defense is only ever worthwhile when it is stacked to the extreme. In combination with this, the game specifically prevents us from stacking to the extreme by placing a lower bound on monster cRatio (Essentially cutting off the most potent end of the curve).
Damage mitigation as a function of Defense (For Players) looks something like this:
As it stands, most players can never bring themselves out of the far-left range on powerful monsters without extreme stacking of defensive gear and buffs. Likewise, when they finally do break out of that range, the curve instantly cuts off at 1.0 cRatio before the players are able to gain truly meaningful defensive benefits from Defense.
While explaining the basics of Defense to people who don't understand it is a noble venture, it does nothing to address the inherent flaws of the Defense stat. It's fine to say "Hey, Defense gets better when you have more of it!", which would be true (And is true for monsters!), but so long as monsters are given a "Free pass" on floored cRatio, Defense will never be able to be stacked high enough for it to be worth a buff slot.



Reply With Quote