To the devs!

[Economizer]

If they do, god I'm hoping for Full Potency, only duration increase on the spells.

I'm hoping full potency and duration and increased merits increase the duration or accuracy further.

[Daniel_Hatcher]

I'm hoping full potency and duration and increased merits increase the duration or accuracy further.

Well yes, I'd 100% want this. Fingers crossed!

Also 100% Yes to the new enfeebles.

[Neisan_Quetz]

I'd be happy with just Phalanx 2 and Dia 3 being adjusted tbh. I'm mostly fine with the rest of them, it's just annoying I have to lose 2 merits because of Voidlogs procs.


EDIT: unless they revamp it to the point additional merits in slow/para are actually worth it

[ManaKing]

I just want them to do anything......

I'm not really sure if the proposed change will really make a difference. If Gravity or Bind can land for more than 10 seconds it would be a decent safety net. Other than that, I don't see Slow, Silence, Addle, Paralyze, or Blind really making a difference against NMs. They are just going to TP or cast magic like you aren't even there most likely.

I wonder if Break will actually do anything after this change. It's so limited use right now. It's my 4th sleep after Sleep 2 + 1, and Bind are already spent.

[saevel]

I just want them to do anything......

I'm not really sure if the proposed change will really make a difference. If Gravity or Bind can land for more than 10 seconds it would be a decent safety net. Other than that, I don't see Slow, Silence, Addle, Paralyze, or Blind really making a difference against NMs. They are just going to TP or cast magic like you aren't even there most likely.

I wonder if Break will actually do anything after this change. It's so limited use right now. It's my 4th sleep after Sleep 2 + 1, and Bind are already spent.

This is what I keep saying, our current enfeeble set is only useful vs things weaker then us. Otherwise it's like trying to stop a forest fire by pissing on it. Well GG could probably drown the whole forest, but that's a different discussion entirely.

We need new enfeebles that reduce the target's stats. I'm talking about reducing it's MAB / MDB / INT / STR / ect.. by a sizable margin, at least on par with our current Gain-X spell line but preferably double that. Make the potency based on enfeebling magic and not something like dINT / dMND. Or give something that lowers the enemy's critical hit evasion, that would be epic just on it's own.

We'll see what SE does though.

[Daniel_Hatcher]

Messing about with Cure IV on the test server I got these numbers:

Naked (RDM capped skill): 532
Naked (Light Arts): 547
13% Potency (87+26 MND / 80+2 VIT): 630
33% Potency (87+26 MND / 80+2 VIT): 742
33% Potency (Primeval Brew): 851

Didn't have the body (still after it), torque or earring to test at 50%.

[tyrantsyn]

Messing about with Cure IV on the test server I got these numbers:

Naked (RDM capped skill): 532
Naked (Light Arts): 547
13% Potency (87+26 MND / 80+2 VIT): 630
33% Potency (87+26 MND / 80+2 VIT): 742
33% Potency (Primeval Brew): 851

Didn't have the body (still after it), torque or earring to test at 50%.

Those are nice number's. A little confuse in the difference between casting cure IV spells for Cure V numbers instead of just getting the spell. But I guess the balance is in the fact that you can only see those number's off the one spell instead of casting Cure IV & V back to back for the same value's. Did you happen to test III at all?

[Daniel_Hatcher]

Those are nice number's. A little confuse in the difference between casting cure IV spells for Cure V numbers instead of just getting the spell. But I guess the balance is in the fact that you can only see those number's off the one spell instead of casting Cure IV & V back to back for the same value's. Did you happen to test III at all?

On a quick test.

Cure I
naked: 56
/sch: 58
13%: 63
33%: 77

Cure II
naked: 131
/sch: 133
13%: 148
33%: 176

Cure III
naked: 286
/sch: 293
13%: 323
33%: 389

[Greatguardian]

Those are nice number's. A little confuse in the difference between casting cure IV spells for Cure V numbers instead of just getting the spell. But I guess the balance is in the fact that you can only see those number's off the one spell instead of casting Cure IV & V back to back for the same value's. Did you happen to test III at all?

Cure V has unique enmity properties and doesn't share a timer with Cure IV.

WHM now has, essentially, 3 Cure Vs (lolcure6) while RDM has 1. Fine with me, really.

[tyrantsyn]

Cure V has unique enmity properties and doesn't share a timer with Cure IV.

WHM now has, essentially, 3 Cure Vs (lolcure6) while RDM has 1. Fine with me, really.

Fine with me as well, just can't help but to giggle a bit.