Quote Originally Posted by Malamasala View Post
Main purpose is to encourage people to play different jobs.

Imagine if WAR had ALL WSes. Why play any other jobs? When you exclude things from jobs, you start encouraging people to play more of the jobs.

While in theory we could let everyone merit all WSes, then we would have to impose some kind of "You got to equip 2 of them on WAR else it has too many" mechanics.
not sure how that is encouraging anyone to play different jobs.

If war had all the WS he would still use GA because it would be dumb to use anything else, not even sure what that statement was on about at all.

amd ur 3rd and final statement makes just as little sense (no offense) as the restriction is already on the weapon being specific to the weapon type(read you can't use club WS using an axe)

The point eco is trying to make is that it is restricting how well you can performs x and y job because you had to merit a b and c WS. It is not making anyone more unique in any way at all. If you have sam you will merit shoha or retire it for example as it will fall so short for the bar minimum. It is basically a arbitrary limitation just to make an illusion of "uniqueness" that really is not there.