Results -9 to 0 of 83

Thread: Zanshin? why?

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    120
    Quote Originally Posted by brayen View Post
    I want to stress how disappointed i am at the recent development given to SAM. the whole development has revolved around improving a trait that relies on missing. It is so wrong and counter productive. What melee would want a trait that promotes missing? that is like promoting being bad, and our Emperian armor is littered with this useless stuff.

    It is not so much that sam requires a ton of improvements (abyssea nature with it's improvements to crit hit WS is the only thing hurting the job at the moment) but that was just a disgraceful low blow to sam.
    but lets go back to the OP.

    I too i'm disappointed around improving a trait that relies on missing because with the current state of the game (abyssea and RR atma and being able to cap accuracy so easily) where missing is very few. I'm i complaining about it the set bonus on af3 of zanshin no, do i think it could have been something different yes. Can i deal with it, yes, but imo for the very few times zanshin comes into play having the set bonus evolve around it was meh for ME, but maybe not for others. Now i can go into my opinion about the stats placed on SAM af3 hands as well but its really irelevant to the OP.
    (0)
    Last edited by Superchicken; 03-16-2011 at 03:11 AM.