
Originally Posted by
Alhanelem
Personal attacks don't strengthen your argument. You're just saying "your'e bad, you're awful" with no explained basis whatsoever (and it's unreasonable and unfair of you to say so without actually facing me). Until I see you beat all 20 jobs, as all 20 jobs, with an opponent doing their best and not just letting you kill them, you're full of it.
I don't discount that SCH has its uses, but it's not a glory-be end-all great sub for all situations, and you can't set your subjob in response to one person that's annoying you and still do just as well against everyone else. I could argue that you're the one who is bad because you only play 1v1s and have no demonstrated team play capabaility, but I won't do that, and instead give you the chance to in some way show that you're capable of performing well in Ballista the way it was designed instead of using it as a vehicle for duels. So far I get the impression that you're like people in every game with duel system- you think you're great because you can win at duels, but in reality are not very good at anything else. Winning 1v1s doesn't mean you're awesome. You need to be able to perform well in all aspects of the PvP system in the light of how it was designed. It was not made for and is not directly balanced for, 1v1 competitions. Period. The PvP system was originally created as a team sport, not a duel system.
Aside from all of that, even if you were totally right about how valuable SCH sub is, the fact that it would be so good is itself a balance problem. The fact that you suggest that you must be sub SCH to win is an indication that it's too good, if you can't sub anything else and still win.
I'm not going to keep going on this. You're most likely going to respond to this with another post about how bad I am at PvP without actually addressing the post, so there's no point in crapping up another thread over it.