Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Stoneskin II

  1. 10-31-2011 12:07 PM #1
    Hashmalum
    Player Hashmalum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    201
    Character
    Hashmalum
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    RDM Lv 99

    Stoneskin II

    Stoneskin II would be nice to have for going into buffing range for the frontline and not being one-shotted. It has been almost 70 levels since we got the first one. What does everyone else think?
    (4)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-31-2011 12:37 PM #2
    Glacont
    Player Glacont's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    San d'Oria
    Posts
    88
    Earthern Armor appears to be SE's answer to the next step of buffers, however, I am all for an second tier. On another note, Stoneskin II does pose a question. If presented to us, whom will have access to cast it? Will WHM have sole rights or will this extend to all mage classes?
    (1)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-31-2011 09:03 PM #3
    Daniel_Hatcher
    Player Daniel_Hatcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    San d'Oria
    Posts
    2,577
    Character
    Alvian
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    MNK Lv 12
    Stoneskin II should only be added in my view if it's included with 2 things.

    1. RDM also gets it, but NOT SCH.
    2. It's like Phalanx II in that it's party member targetable.

    Otherwise they should just raise the cap on Stoneskin.
    (5)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 11-02-2011 01:35 AM #4
    cidbahamut
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel_Hatcher View Post
    raise the cap on Stoneskin.
    The correct solution to the problem.
    (4)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 11-05-2011 06:07 PM #5
    saevel
    Player saevel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,350
    Quote Originally Posted by Glacont View Post
    Earthern Armor appears to be SE's answer to the next step of buffers, however, I am all for an second tier. On another note, Stoneskin II does pose a question. If presented to us, whom will have access to cast it? Will WHM have sole rights or will this extend to all mage classes?
    WHM / RDM most likely. It's a self target enhancing spell that can't be cast on others, sounds like something for RDM. But White Mage should also get it as it's a White Magic spell and would help ya'll out from being one shoted.
    (0)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 11-12-2011 01:50 AM #6
    Jykia
    Player Jykia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    San d'Oria
    Posts
    11
    Character
    Jykia
    World
    Quetzalcoatl
    Main Class
    DNC Lv 90
    a lot of t2 spells should be added by now, aquaviel, stonskin, blink..

    actually... most of those should be t3 at or levels
    (2)
    No user manual.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 11-12-2011 11:59 PM #7
    saevel
    Player saevel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,350
    Quote Originally Posted by Jykia View Post
    a lot of t2 spells should be added by now, aquaviel, stonskin, blink..

    actually... most of those should be t3 at or levels
    Well they did fix Aquaveil up, it scales up with enhancing magic. Plus what would a Tier II do that the Tier I doesn't. Definitely should have a tier II Blink / Stoneskin and Spikes buffs.
    (1)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 11-17-2011 11:18 PM #8
    cidbahamut
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,003
    Quote Originally Posted by saevel View Post
    Well they did fix Aquaveil up, it scales up with enhancing magic.
    Really? Could you link me to some info on that so I can update my Aquaveil set accordingly?
    (1)
    Last edited by cidbahamut; 11-17-2011 at 11:20 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 11-18-2011 08:14 AM #9
    Greatguardian
    Player Greatguardian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,238
    For any mage that had gear worth a damn, the Aquaveil change was a Nerf, not a Buff =/.
    (1)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »