BALLISTA TOURNAMENT

[Urteil]

How is it not a flaw that you have to gear for your opponent?

That's like playing Pokemon TCG and knowing that your opponent has a Water deck so you stack your deck with Thunder types. Seriously, it's actually cheating in competitions.

I have the gear, I've used the gear. Doesn't mean it's right that it has to be that way, or a good thing in any way.

Shooting for one piece benefits several situations for both mages and melees separately, made for PvP from SE; what's your issue with that?

The only equivalent we have here as far as your deck vs. deck thing goes - is you know the job of your enemy.

I don't have an issue with it, as long as the gear is useful in PvE too and doesn't only activate in PvP - you want to make one an extension of the other where the balancing comes into play with abilities/spells being modulated in the specific environment in which PvP happens.


Really though, I've been saying Warrior needs something nice for years, but if you really want to win on a DD try Samurai.

One day I sincerely hope through ingenious JA's, raw damage, or through WS updates they will get a GA WS that silences and addles, and stuns the enemy for a severe beat down.

I've never felt pride about killing a warrior and we both would agree rightly so, I'm more concerned with RDM, BLU, BLM, and Paladins with Aegis/Burtgang. Those are the enemies that I am concerned with fighting.

I would go so far as to give Warrior native regain, I am far more in your camp than you realize.