Dynamis Update Petition.

[Savannah]

I'm still not seeing a good reason >.>

[Daigotsu]

I'm still not seeing a good reason >.>

That means you care more about you play experience than that of others, which is not something that a company looking to make money will really take into account.

[Confused]

Confused/Quetz

[Alhanelem]

All you needed to say is "we don't just do it for gil." But if you only get gil out of it once in a while, then

I also never used the words "bunch of elitist *$%holes", nor did I automatically assume that everyone you associate with is exactly the same as eachother.

I'm still not seeing a good reason >.>

Then you're blind, because eliminating the aggrivation of getting jumped and long drawn out events and having to schedule way in advance (only to have it not work) should be reason enough.

Additionally- no one said you had to play 7 days a week. But you can probably play more than 2, which is the current maximum possible.

This post does not constitute endorsement of the petition, no matter what the OP writes.

[Helel]

I really think people should wait for more information to be released. It's totally possible you're only going to be allowed a 60m entry once per day. They said nothing about time extensions. If they do that, that's actually less time than you would normally have if you went once every three days. We just don't know anything about it really. Also, I know a lot of people that hated the idea of abyssea, but then when they actually participated in it, they loved it. Just have some patience! It's not like there's any reason to do dynamis now anyway...

[Savannah]

Al, You implied it. You didn't have to say it.

Also, our ls does things as a whole, and our schedules are completely random. We do 1 dyna run on Saturdays only. Also we've been jumped before. It's whatever...find a new zone *oooooooooooooo*.

Scheduling far in advance, honestly we've never done it. We've never believed in it. I love Abyssea, I liked Campaign. I didn't even touch Brennar or w/e it is.

Like I said originally, if they throw us more details I may reconsider. Just for now, I'd like my dynamis to be old school dynamisy....yes dynamisy.

[Alhanelem]

Al, You implied it. You didn't have to say it.

I didn't imply anything. I did have to say it.

It's whatever...find a new zone *oooooooooooooo*.

It's not whatever when the zone you planned was the zone your group needed most. Many people like planning things out and like a structured environment.

This situation is tiresome, it's basically just like "I like the old games the best" "I like the old way of doing things" "I like the old this and the old that." You are simply used to a system that's been around. That doesn't mean the system isn't flawed, no matter how much you are used to it and/or like it. I'm sure if these changes were made 5 years ago, you wouldn't be saying "I like the old school dynamis"- since it isn't "old school" when it's newer. Be a little more open minded.

[Unaisis]

i laugh at the fact people are hating something that is not even implemented yet lol. chances are~~~ even tho that the people complaining will end up kinda liking the new way and still stiffen their arse cheeks and say it sucks XD.

i Welcome the change with open arms!!

it sure would be a new and fresh take on old content!!! thereby making the game have new opportunities for events turning for best or worse!! i love it!! it could even be.... Challenging! :O

[bishop]

I disagree with an update that I don't have the full details on. Wait, what?

[Laverda]

Laverda/Bismarck