
Originally Posted by
Kitkat
Your source information, I'd like to see it. Currently you are basing what you have on "eyeball statistics" while also reaffirming what I already said about all source damage in relation to tiers(Either that or you didn't notice the initial tier was based on NO AFTERMATH DOT). And being that Aftermath is not a 100% active function of a weapon it can not be considered in all aspects, hence the reason for mentioning different tier distributions throughout my post (if you had actually read it you would have seen that). This also was stated in the event that blu actually gained the ability to use relic, thus why I said his tiering is incorrect when factoring the different aspects of the weapons in various scenarios.
Now, to look at all source damage tiering: The WoE weapon actually falls below other weapons due to the fact it has no other added effect, or aftermath effect, meaning in all source damage it drops below excal in long term. It is like the old mentality of being 2hander/thf over 2hander/sam in which the Spike damage did not compensate for the over all DoT+WS frequency damage and actually resulted in lower over all source damage.
Only reason almace has higher all source damage is because of two factors: very strong WS and high proc rate of ODD aftermath. Alternatively, WoE version has only the WS not to mention a lower DPS base. Badeliar+3 has a base DPS of 15.50 compared to Excals 17.77, no aftermath effect, and no other additional stats/effects thus is weaker especially in all source damage. Remember DPS is based off the calculation of (Base*60)/delay. On top of that, the add effect of excal has ~5% additional activation on top of 95 weapons higher hidden activation rates at all times (2x=20%, 2.5=15%, 3x=10-12%). thus the reasoning that WoE version falls behind in all source since it only has the DPS and WS going for it and nothing else.
Unfortunately this is too low of a sample to fully determine crit rate. It would be like someone parsing DA with only 100 hits then saying "Yep, it's only ~8% activation" for war. Generally you need large samples on this to get accurate numbers. I say this because I have parsed a great deal on such things and found that you don't reach accurate rates until you have a substantial sample. While I still doubt they had capped dDex, it would probably been closer to 15~17% with a larger sample.