Where's our Relic...?

[Kitkat]

He had mostly correct scaling, I'm not sure about Tizona compared to Excal as they can't be used on the same jobs. But Almace DESTROYS every other sword in the game, hands down no question asked. The actual scaling should be
Almace > Badelair > everything else.

The reason for this is CDC. CDC is one of the best WS's you can get for a few reasons. First being its 4.25 (2.25 + 2) worth of fTP without off hand, with off hand your talking 5.25 worth of fTP. Next the WSC is 60% DEX and it's a critical hit WS. As you stack DEX your dDEX goes up, once you pass +40 (40 higher then targets AGI) the next 10 DEX will give you 1% crit rate each, thus its easy to cap crit rate using a DEX WS.

Put all these together and CDC smash's anything vorpal, KoTR or Expacion can do, the difference is so great that it easily makes up for the add effect on Excal. That add effect btw has a low proc rate, really low as in 5% low. The ODD on Almace you can keep up by spamming the best sword WS in the game, thus it needs to be accounted for.

That all being said, BLU should of been added to Excal out of principal.

And honestly, all the special WS's should be made permanently available through quests you do after obtaining the weapon.

Your source information, I'd like to see it. Currently you are basing what you have on "eyeball statistics" while also reaffirming what I already said about all source damage in relation to tiers(Either that or you didn't notice the initial tier was based on NO AFTERMATH DOT). And being that Aftermath is not a 100% active function of a weapon it can not be considered in all aspects, hence the reason for mentioning different tier distributions throughout my post (if you had actually read it you would have seen that). This also was stated in the event that blu actually gained the ability to use relic, thus why I said his tiering is incorrect when factoring the different aspects of the weapons in various scenarios.

Now, to look at all source damage tiering: The WoE weapon actually falls below other weapons due to the fact it has no other added effect, or aftermath effect, meaning in all source damage it drops below excal in long term. It is like the old mentality of being 2hander/thf over 2hander/sam in which the Spike damage did not compensate for the over all DoT+WS frequency damage and actually resulted in lower over all source damage.

Only reason almace has higher all source damage is because of two factors: very strong WS and high proc rate of ODD aftermath. Alternatively, WoE version has only the WS not to mention a lower DPS base. Badeliar+3 has a base DPS of 15.50 compared to Excals 17.77, no aftermath effect, and no other additional stats/effects thus is weaker especially in all source damage. Remember DPS is based off the calculation of (Base*60)/delay. On top of that, the add effect of excal has ~5% additional activation on top of 95 weapons higher hidden activation rates at all times (2x=20%, 2.5=15%, 3x=10-12%). thus the reasoning that WoE version falls behind in all source since it only has the DPS and WS going for it and nothing else.

Sawtelle had ~176 dex and couldn't cap dDEX on a Part 1 Tier 1 VWNM, 140 dex isn't close to what's necessary. Small sample but out of 132 landed hits he only managed 9% crit rate from dDEX, which would put the weakest VWNM at around ~130 AGI.

Unfortunately this is too low of a sample to fully determine crit rate. It would be like someone parsing DA with only 100 hits then saying "Yep, it's only ~8% activation" for war. Generally you need large samples on this to get accurate numbers. I say this because I have parsed a great deal on such things and found that you don't reach accurate rates until you have a substantial sample. While I still doubt they had capped dDex, it would probably been closer to 15~17% with a larger sample.

[saevel]

Your source information, I'd like to see it. Currently you are basing what you have on "eyeball statistics" while also reaffirming what I already said about all source damage in relation to tiers(Either that or you didn't notice the initial tier was based on NO AFTERMATH DOT). And being that Aftermath is not a 100% active function of a weapon it can not be considered in all aspects, hence the reason for mentioning different tier distributions throughout my post (if you had actually read it you would have seen that). This also was stated in the event that blu actually gained the ability to use relic, thus why I said his tiering is incorrect when factoring the different aspects of the weapons in various scenarios.

Now, to look at all source damage tiering: The WoE weapon actually falls below other weapons due to the fact it has no other added effect, or aftermath effect, meaning in all source damage it drops below excal in long term. It is like the old mentality of being 2hander/thf over 2hander/sam in which the Spike damage did not compensate for the over all DoT+WS frequency damage and actually resulted in lower over all source damage.

Only reason almace has higher all source damage is because of two factors: very strong WS and high proc rate of ODD aftermath. Alternatively, WoE version has only the WS not to mention a lower DPS base. Badeliar+3 has a base DPS of 15.50 compared to Excals 17.77, no aftermath effect, and no other additional stats/effects thus is weaker especially in all source damage. Remember DPS is based off the calculation of (Base*60)/delay. On top of that, the add effect of excal has ~5% additional activation on top of 95 weapons higher hidden activation rates at all times (2x=20%, 2.5=15%, 3x=10-12%). thus the reasoning that WoE version falls behind in all source since it only has the DPS and WS going for it and nothing else.



Unfortunately this is too low of a sample to fully determine crit rate. It would be like someone parsing DA with only 100 hits then saying "Yep, it's only ~8% activation" for war. Generally you need large samples on this to get accurate numbers. I say this because I have parsed a great deal on such things and found that you don't reach accurate rates until you have a substantial sample. While I still doubt they had capped dDex, it would probably been closer to 15~17% with a larger sample.

I know you like your Excal and all, but please stop trying to show it's better then a CDC weapon, its not, it's already been demonstrated. CDC is -that- powerful.

Also which NM and what where the testing conditions? Because from everything I've seen they do not have ridiculous stats at all. And this isn't eyeball testing either.

Also your DPS numbers are WAY off, you made the classic mistake of factoring them without accounting for fSTR. Now while I doubt Badelair will shift too much, CDC alone pretty much guarantee's it'll destroy the other ones.