Results 1 to 10 of 198

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player Tamoa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    1,061
    Character
    Tamoa
    World
    Asura
    Main Class
    SAM Lv 99
    My main gripe with the loot distribution system isn't so much that people get an item they can't equip (yet). It's much more when the SAME person gets the SAME ra/ex item several times.
    (8)

  2. #2
    Player Alhanelem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Bastok
    Posts
    11,166
    Character
    Tahngarthor
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    SMN Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Tamoa View Post
    My main gripe with the loot distribution system isn't so much that people get an item they can't equip (yet). It's much more when the SAME person gets the SAME ra/ex item several times.
    Then I don't think it would be too much to ask for the same R/E item not to drop for someone who already has it.

    What part of eleven R/E boots going to three people says "increased circulation" to you?
    See above. If someone already has it, they shouldn't get another one. Agree fully with that. Still, it's random. How many people did you have there?
    (2)

  3. #3
    Player Arylias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Lastok
    Posts
    10
    Character
    Arylias
    World
    Quetzalcoatl
    Main Class
    WAR Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Alhanelem View Post
    If someone already has it, they shouldn't get another one. Agree fully with that. Still, it's random. How many people did you have there?
    We had a full alliance.
    (0)

  4. #4
    Player Alhanelem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Bastok
    Posts
    11,166
    Character
    Tahngarthor
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    SMN Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Arylias View Post
    We had a full alliance.
    If you had a full alliance and the same two people got half of that particular drop...

    Maybe there is a pattern. Any consistency in their behavior?

    In short, I think the argument that not getting to choose who the items go to is valid, but the issue of items going to people that already have them is whats really wrong here.
    I completely agree with this.
    (2)