Heavy Strike low accuracy problem

[Granny]

isn't damage garbage now too? somthing like 400 dmg on high deffence mobs even thought its auto critical? AND misses a lot too no matter how much accuracy you get for the spell? ='(

[Atoreis]

isn't damage garbage now too? somthing like 400 dmg on high deffence mobs even thought its auto critical? AND misses a lot too no matter how much accuracy you get for the spell? ='(

Damage is fine. 400 sounds like you read Prothscar post about Hahava too. First of all ( I hope he wont be mad at me again ) he wrote "A sample of the damage:
No CA:
383
464
465
333
479

CA:
980
1206"

which means its really good stacked with CA (because of very high mod) and actually tells us a little about the damage because Hahava has stances in which it takes very reduced damage. I personally saw 190 200 Fudo while it was resistance to physical and I did 350 CA+Efflux+QC while few moments later I did 290 Delta thrust w/o any buffs.

[Prothscar]

Damage is fine. 400 sounds like you read Prothscar post about Hahava too. First of all ( I hope he wont be mad at me again ) he wrote "A sample of the damage:
No CA:
383
464
465
333
479

CA:
980
1206"

which means its really good stacked with CA (because of very high mod) and actually tells us a little about the damage because Hahava has stances in which it takes very reduced damage. I personally saw 190 200 Fudo while it was resistance to physical and I did 350 CA+Efflux+QC while few moments later I did 290 Delta thrust w/o any buffs.

Not mad about what you think I was mad about. o.o

In any case, damage isn't terrible considering the target, but I suspect that 95 makes the gap a bit smaller for other DDs, I haven't had a chance to try out Ukko's or Fudo @ 95 on a highish VWNM yet.

Maybe there is something we're not doing right.

Something which the devs are taking into consideration that we can't see.

Not too sure about that, I think things just got Tanakified (tm).