Alexandrite

[Tamoa]

Why oh WHY would ANYONE argue against the suggestion made by the OP? Why??? Does it in any way have any form of negative effect on you or anyone else? No, that's right, it doesn't.

I can absolutely understand the issue at hand here. Being forced to give up a large part of your MH space OR being forced to pay real money for mules to be able to hold alexandrites, is total bs.

Common sense says you shouldn't turn in alexandrites until you have them all, or nearly all. You know - just in case. I know I wouldn't do it. Just as I wouldn't turn in currency for a relic before I have all, or very close to all of it. It doesn't have anything to do with commitment or lack thereof. It's a matter of being realistic and recognize that you never know what tomorrow brings.

I really think that you, Alhanelem, are being negative only for the sake of being negative. Please explain to me and everyone else in favour of the OP's suggestion, exactly why you think it's a bad one. And please don't use that "you should be committed enough to the task blah blah" as a reason. Because it really isn't about that.

[Alhanelem]

Why oh WHY would ANYONE argue against the suggestion made by the OP?

Just because it does or doesn't have a negative effect on <insert person or thing here> doesn't automatically mean something should be implemented (Nor does it mean it shouldn't). That baing said, I'm not "against" it. I only see it as unnecessary, a perk, a bonus, and something that is of such little importance that dev time could be better spent in other areas. It's not in any way a bad suggestion.

Comment deleted by Moderator

No, people making personal attacks on others are the worst posters on the site. I didn't say there was "something wrong" with the poster's suggestion. I even proposed an alternate implementation, which no one noticed because they were too busy being at my throat and attacking me. Clearly posting a lot makes one a target.

[Leonlionheart]

Well, nirvana is regarded by many to be the best if not one of the best. For the most part, the best mythics are the ones for non-melee jobs.

WHAT THE **** AM I READING

[Alhanelem]

WHAT THE **** AM I READING

(edit: practicing what is being preached.)

Maybe instead of an immature comment, you could state your problem with the statement, and/or which mythic you think is in fact actually the best. I can certainly tell you which ones are the most popular, whether or not you think they're the best, those are the ones people get.

Comment deleted by Moderator

Hey, i'm not the one throwing out insults and ignoring any actual content in the post.

Step 1. Someone A posts a topic.
Step 2. Someone B posts their opinion on the topic, which some people happen to disagree with.
Step 3. Someone A starts attacking someone B, ignoring anything meaningful they might have said and throwing out insults, telilng them to "Stop posting" because their opinion is different, and/or generally being immature.
Step 4. .... profit? Probably not.

I really think that you, Alhanelem, are being negative only for the sake of being negative. Please explain to me and everyone else in favour of the OP's suggestion, exactly why you think it's a bad one.

I am not being negative for the sake of being negative. It's not fun to be negative, I get no joy out of it. However, I never actually said (and I'm repeating this yet again) "This is a bad idea" or anything even close to that. There's a difference between something not being a necessity or vitially important and it being 'bad." It's not bad. I just don't see why it NEEDs to happen.

[Kimble]

I really doubt it would take so much work to add an NPC that will let you turn in 100 singles into a 100 piece.

Honestly, if that was your point that "the development team should work on other things instead of this" you could have worded it totally different to be supportive of the idea, but not something you personally think is something that should be the most important thing to work on atm.

But no seriously, this doesn't hurt anyone. In fact, it might give more people an incentive to start a mythic knowing it wont take up a ton of space to hold alex.

[Rearden]

WHAT THE **** AM I READING

Someone still thinks Yagrush is worth doing? Is it 2009?

[Mirage]

Someone still thinks Yagrush is worth doing? Is it 2009?

Maybe it's not worth doing now, but I definitely think that it should be buffed in a way that made it worth doing .

[Rearden]

Content where more than one person is in range of being hit by AoE (and in essence, Divine Veil) & making it so WHM AF3+2 didn't already proc as much as Yagrush...lol.

[Byrth]

Wait, what? Are they pro-rating secondary characters now? Are you serious? dang... that's awesome if true, because they never did before the account transfer.

I activated my mule and it said something along the lines of:
Extra Character: 100 Crysta
Pro Rata: -90 Crysta
Total: 10 Crysta

I was activating him about 3 days before the end of the payment cycle. If you did it right, you could probably activate and deactivate a mule for 3~4 cents/crysta.

As far as Nirvana, I'd agree that it's easily the best staff for magic BPs, but it isn't like it's really a game-changer. At 95 with a pretty basic Avatar MAB set, it will be less than a 20% damage bonus to magic BPs.

[Aver]

Ahh analhelm with his profound logic strikes again. Obviously you are not upgrading a mythic and/or have gil coming out of every orifice of your body.

Yeah hold on, lemme start trading in currency, with no hopes of getting it back should I change my mind, for a weapon that may or may not be worth it in the long run, I'm a gamblin' man!