[dev1024] Job adjustments - RDM

[Hyrist]

*sniffes*

The smell of QQ in the evening is wonderful.

Anyways, Temper is exactly what I expected it to be. A Enspell answer to the problem of sambas conflicting with them.
Still an open ended question on whether or not Temper will conflict with Enspells though.

To the Crying:
Would people have cried as much if it was an Enspell III line, I don't think so.

TP feed argument? Laughable still. What does RDM melee on that you're so concerned about feeding TP too? Fodder mobs are hard now, you heard it here folks.

Manifesto? Buffing issue, I can see, but I'd rather they develop an AoE/Sphere type spell than let this one go party target. I'm a little disappointed this can't be accession-able but it's not unexpected.

Once again inflated expectations cause for a riot that didn't need to happen. I don't expect new party buffs or debuffs to happen until the 99+ range. That also goes for those who are crying about cures too.

I'll believe the 'adjustments' to current debuffs when I see it.


The answers I want to see is more specfics as far as what party buffs they plan in mind?

What new debuff spells they are cooking up, or which ideas they'd like to see more of along the vein.


My recommendation as far as assisting our buffing trick is a 5m JA that allows us to transfer ALL of the buffs we have on ourselves over to one member of the party. That would flatly fit what they're describing in the Manifesto, and it wouldn't be broken due to use limits, nor would it clash with our theme. It would just focus us on buffing one important member of the party to godlike proportions rather than simply being another BRD or COR.

And with Temper, that sort of system works out quite well.

[SpankWustler]

I get the feeling this whole awful mess will go full-circle when it turns out this spell has a static 5% potency and doesn't stack with en-spells. EVERYBODY LOSES!

When SE sets out to make a worthless spell, they take no prisoners and leave no village unburned.