Easy fix is to just rework cure formulas so healing skill has a bigger effect on potency
Easy fix is to just rework cure formulas so healing skill has a bigger effect on potency
It would have to be pretty severe for a smaller amount of difference.Easy fix is to just rework cure formulas so healing skill has a bigger effect on potency
RDM/SCH or anyone /sch alone starts off at a base B(-?) capped White Magic skill, then you can add cure skill gear that SCH and RDM both have decent amounts in, not to mention the cure potency amount accessible to them.
The problem doesn't lie necessarily in that sort of regulation, as much as it is the vast imbalance between DD/Melee jobs and cure/support jobs. Meaning those support jobs get shoved into the smallest number of slots possible no matter what. If you make RDM or scholar a competent healer on top of whatever else they offer, then WHM ceases to become worthwhile, because curing is the BULK of what they offer, where as RDM and Scholar have their respective nukes buffs and debuffs to fall back on or assist additionally on top of being the designated cure bi-... bot.
If they're not, and the focus is instead placed on making sure their unique contributions are viable enough to possibly bump a DD off the roster depending on what's available, then their healing could be brought up to a decent enough level where it does not outshine what they're supposed to offer as a whole, yet can support or take over LIGHT loads.
However, as it stands now, SCH and RDM can still handle light curing loads, so there's no need for Cure V. And if their contributions help mitigate overall damage, it'll likely stay that way. And in questionable situations, it allows for jobs like Dancers and Blue Mages to shine in their support aspects.
So really there's not much of a strong argument for giving out the spell, except for the desire to bump WHM off the throne as the go-to healer.
Raise II, still no Cure V, then give us back our convert for RDM only!!!!!!!
This is the problem:
Stack some MP on a war/whm, and he has the same tools that red mages and scholars have for healing. When SE states that they're trying to make all jobs viable for end game, but they end up making one job completely irreplaceable (whm), and another job a juggernaut (blm), how are red mages and scholars supposed to compete for end game party slots? Right now you may bring a single red mage per alliance if the monster isn't immune to enfeebles, but scholars have to compete with specialists when they focus on healing or nuking because they get incrementally worse as they swap between the two.
What. (letters)
Only SOLO healer.
Cure loads can be manged by multiple mages/jobs of varying types who have cure capacities.
And you wonder why I ask for buffs in the melee and buffing department? In light curing load situations RDM offers little to the table, buffs in both of these aspects would correct that easily.Stack some MP on a war/whm...
Scholar already seems to be getting a better line of unique spells, particularly in the 2hr department. Not only do I expect our enfeebling game to improve for more difficult monsters, and that Scholar get a more unique set of spells to assit with, that's part of my flat out demands in them filling the order they put out with the Manifesto.Right now you may bring a single red mage per alliance if the monster isn't immune to enfeebles, but scholars have to compete with specialists when they focus on healing or nuking because they get incrementally worse as they swap between the two.
Honestly, I have the same policy for us main healing, as people do for Red Mages melee. When it matters, you're not supposed to be the one doing it over a specalist. Only difference is, because you CAN do it safely, you can help out. But I would expect the main role of a RDM would be to support with buffs and enfeeble, tossing out back up cures, status cures, and nukes when available to do so.
But there's no reason to expect RDM to solo heal difficult situations. Either split the duty or invite a WHM and have us support it. We have a specialty and we should be doing that, it just needs to be improved upon.
Or you could drop all the dead weight, get a whm, bard, and a few DD's and kill twice as many NM's in the same amount of time.
I haven't played anything but white mage when I go out with my LS in over a month simply because it's the backbone of everything end game right now. Once you have a white mage and a few solid DD's you can fill the rest of your alliance with scrubs and window lickers and still be effective.
I support the OP. Right now, RDM is dead as far as abyssea is concerned. Not just second choice, but dead. Tripple-atma powered WHM is all the support that's needed for most situations, and if it isn't enough, then you take two of them. But there is no situation that calls for RDM anymore.
The idea that giving RDM Cure V would de-throne WHM as the most desired and principal choice for healer is just not plausible. Lack of cureskin and cure potency gear would make RDM Cure V gimped compared to WHM cure V. And RDM wouldn't have Cure VI in case a tank requires an urgent, large cure right after you've already cast Cure V.
Rdm gets 46% cure potency max, that's not really that lacking, Smn and Whm are the only two that can cap it iirc, 4% from cap isn't really that bad. I could care less if the job is 'dead' in Abyssea, you act as if Rdm is the only job excluded there.
|
© SQUARE ENIX FINAL FANTASY, SQUARE ENIX, and the SQUARE ENIX logo are registered trademarks of Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. Vana'diel , Tetra Master, PLAYONLINE, the PLAYONLINE logo, Rise of the Zilart, Chains of Promathia, Treasures of Aht Urhgan, and Wings of the Goddess are registered trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd. The rating icon is a registered trademark of the Entertainment Software Association. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Online play requires internet connection. |