Quote Originally Posted by Alhanelem View Post
There are a lot of people claiming that you can get just as much increased treasure by having a sub THF as by having a main THF and that the extra boost from TH procs and higher level trait on THF doesn't make a difference. Thus, the community team is here to let you know that's BS and that more TH is always better.
But Camate/Mocchi said that the myth wasn't that TH9 vs. TH10 makes no difference, but that TH10 was worse than TH9. And that's an absurd claim in any way I can imagine. No one could possibly have the means to test that even semi-reliably. The best base TH we can get is TH7, meaning you'd need 3 upgrades to get TH10. You can only reliably test it on NMs, and where do you get large enough NM samples for that? And I'm not talking low-tier Abyssea NMs, cause they can die faster than Colibris outside of Abyssea. So it would have to be something like 200 KS99 runs, all with TH10, then another 200 KS99 runs. And considering the difference at that high TH level is marginal, even 400 total samples wouldn't be enough to determine anything accurately. There's just no way at all to make any kind of justified claim that TH10 is worse than TH9. It was certainly not worth the effort of people to go test it.

I'm tired of people saying THF and /THF makes no difference, because it does, and it's not too small either. Only individual tiers between those levels don't add up as much as the two tiers before. But saying it like that is what makes people waste their time on pointless tests like this.