[dev1021] Level Cap Increase

[Francisco]

Upcoming BLM spells:
92: Thunder V
93: Blizzaja

Upcoming WHM spells:
93: Boost-STR

Upcoming RDM spells:
92: Thunder IV
93: Gain-STR

Upcoming BRD songs:
93: Ice Carol II

Upcoming SCH spells:
91: Fire V
95: Blizzard V

Almost certainly more for all of these, but these are for sure.

[Symbiote]

Upcoming BLM spells:
92: Thunder V
93: Blizzaja

Upcoming WHM spells:
93: Boost-STR

Upcoming RDM spells:
92: Thunder IV
93: Gain-STR

Upcoming BRD songs:
93: Ice Carol II

Upcoming SCH spells:
91: Fire V
95: Blizzard V

Almost certainly more for all of these, but these are for sure.

Don't forget RDM and SCH getting Cure V. I'm getting damned tired of having to look for a WHM every time I need a healer for something. SE used to claim they wanted diversity but funneled all healers into WHM again? Cut us some slack here SE.

[Francisco]

Don't forget RDM and SCH getting Cure V. I'm getting damned tired of having to look for a WHM every time I need a healer for something. SE used to claim they wanted diversity but funneled all healers into WHM again? Cut us some slack here SE.

The spells I posted are the spells those jobs are actually getting at those levels - not what I think they should get.

[noodles355]

The spells I posted are the spells those jobs are actually getting at those levels - not what I think they should get.

Proof?
white

[Francisco]

Proof?
white

+3 levels for all these spells, following the Stone > Water > Aero > Fire > Blizzard > Thunder pattern.

I've heard Curaga V, Banish IV and Addle for WHM before 95, but can't confirm. Also heard Break for DRK, a new spell for SCH and another new spell for PLD. No idea what the new spells are though.

[noodles355]

+3 levels for all these spells, following the Stone > Water > Aero > Fire > Blizzard > Thunder pattern.

I asked for proof, not an assumption. However likely it is, it's not 100% fact, and thus you should not state it as 100% fact.

Don't post assumptions as fact. And don't post someone (non-SE) else's assaumptions as fact. They are not facts, they are assumptions. I don't care if you write "I think we'll probably get spell X by Lv92, spell y by 94" etc, but just don't state it as an absolute "We are getting this spell at this level" fact, because it's not.