Explain SE!

[Nvr]

Any thread with a complaint about SE seems to be a hot topic these days. People don't even seem to care what it is. Just an observation.

[Korpg]

Any thread with a complaint about SE seems to be a hot topic these days. People don't even seem to care what it is. Just an observation.

People like drama to begin with. Anything that goes against somebody with power, they are all over that. We have been like that since Medieval times. It is ingrained into our system since childhood. Doesn't matter who it is, mobs of people will fight "against the system" just because.

[Rearden]

No one would be complaining if all we had to do was pay SE directly through the internet as per the past 8 years.

[Korpg]

No one would be complaining if all we had to do was pay SE directly through the internet as per the past 8 years.

Blame the people who hack into accounts and steal your information, not SE for taking measures to protect your information.

PoL has been hacked, information has been stolen, what SE is doing is giving us an option to pay more securely.

[Niyariko]

EXPLAIN SE!?

SE can't explain why everyone in the NA and EU community are mad, the JP have absolutely no issue with Click and Buy since not a single post was made in the JP forum about it. SE thought everyone would love and embrace Click and Buy with joy just like the Japanese.

... oh wait.

I wonder if the Japanese are in rage about the direct payment option...i wonder...

[Rearden]

Blame the people who hack into accounts and steal your information, not SE for taking measures to protect your information.

PoL has been hacked, information has been stolen, what SE is doing is giving us an option to pay more securely.

I'm not accountable if someone uses my credit card, SE is. SE is protecting themselves, not us.

Also, Alhanelem - it's okay man, you don't have to white knight SE in every thread because you're scared wiki will lose it's community status. There's a reason it's called otherwiki.

[Nvr]

I'm not accountable if someone uses my credit card, SE is. SE is protecting themselves, not us.

Has someone else used your credit card due to click and buy, or are you just preblaming SE because you are paranoid there is the possibility?

You don't want to use click and buy, fine. You are concerned about a possible 42 cent international charge from your bank, w/e. Too many people are acting like they have already been scammed by click and buy already even before they have signed up. Just because someone is not outraged by a possible 42 cent bank fee or paranoid about things that may, but likely won't, go wrong until SE adds a new payment option does not mean they are white knighting them. I am sick of seeing posts constantly complaining about the same issue over and over again, and then bullying people who do not share the same concerns as them. It really is just immature.

[Rearden]

lol.

Do you have a low amount of reading comprehension?

Well, before you claim to have ADD and start calling people childish, let me help you out.

POL has been hacked, information has been stolen, what SE is doing is giving us an option to pay more securely.

I'm not accountable if someone uses my credit card (this is in reference to it being more secure, or someone stealing my information), SE is. SE is protecting themselves, not us.

Questions, what are they.

Also, I wonder if you are also a contributor to otherwiki, and by that I mean someone who reposts information without citation?

[Nvr]

I didn't know I would need to cite you for you to know what you said.

I guess I am just confused because of lack of information when you said

I'm not accountable if someone uses my credit card, SE is. SE is protecting themselves, not us.

in response to

Blame the people who hack into accounts and steal your information, not SE for taking measures to protect your information.

PoL has been hacked, information has been stolen, what SE is doing is giving us an option to pay more securely.

SE is using what they feel is a more secure way for us to pay, and it is more likely due to many companies getting hacked recently. I just don't see how your response to that is saying that SE is protecting themselves from our account information getting stolen. They are trying to do a positive thing, and you look past that and say they are just doing it only for personal interest. Do they want to be the ones to get hacked for my information? Hell no they don't. Is it wrong for them to look for a more secure way for us to pay to avoid a huge mess? No, it's not.

I missunderstood what you were reffering to because the idea that SE is transfering responsibility of payment to another company (that they feel is more secure), and therefore avoiding a huge problem if POL gets hacked and our information stolen is just so obvious and does not really need to be pointed out. You even went past that and are suggesting that it is their only reason for doing so, which is entirely speculation. You have no grounds for suggesting that at all.

[katz]

I didn't know I would need to cite you for you to know what you said.

I guess I am just confused because of lack of information when you said



in response to



SE is using what they feel is a more secure way for us to pay, and it is more likely due to many companies getting hacked recently. I just don't see how your response to that is saying that SE is protecting themselves from our account information getting stolen. They are trying to do a positive thing, and you look past that and say they are just doing it only for personal interest. Do they want to be the ones to get hacked for my information? Hell no they don't. Is it wrong for them to look for a more secure way for us to pay to avoid a huge mess? No, it's not.

I missunderstood what you were reffering to because the idea that SE is transfering responsibility of payment to another company (that they feel is more secure), and therefore avoiding a huge problem if POL gets hacked and our information stolen is just so obvious and does not really need to be pointed out. You even went past that and are suggesting that it is their only reason for doing so, which is entirely speculation. You have no grounds for suggesting that at all.

I think SE assumed that Click and Buy was a more secure system than Pol. It appears from the number of people complaining about problems with it, it isnt a more secure system. My friend has had problems with this system like other people. He rang the click and buy phone number at the weekend but couldnt get any one to answer the phone because the number on their website is a private individual and not the correct number. So he copied and pasted the screen that showed there wasnt any payment method to chose. He waited 10 days and still no response. It is SEs problem because at the end of the day, they will lose alot of people because they cant pay for their account. Christa also needs something to fund the account so I dont know what he is going to do. Be warned there is going to be alot of people not playing after 31st August because they cant pay, not because they dont want to pay.