I didn't know I would need to cite you for you to know what you said.
I guess I am just confused because of lack of information when you said
in response toI'm not accountable if someone uses my credit card, SE is. SE is protecting themselves, not us.
SE is using what they feel is a more secure way for us to pay, and it is more likely due to many companies getting hacked recently. I just don't see how your response to that is saying that SE is protecting themselves from our account information getting stolen. They are trying to do a positive thing, and you look past that and say they are just doing it only for personal interest. Do they want to be the ones to get hacked for my information? Hell no they don't. Is it wrong for them to look for a more secure way for us to pay to avoid a huge mess? No, it's not.Blame the people who hack into accounts and steal your information, not SE for taking measures to protect your information.
PoL has been hacked, information has been stolen, what SE is doing is giving us an option to pay more securely.
I missunderstood what you were reffering to because the idea that SE is transfering responsibility of payment to another company (that they feel is more secure), and therefore avoiding a huge problem if POL gets hacked and our information stolen is just so obvious and does not really need to be pointed out. You even went past that and are suggesting that it is their only reason for doing so, which is entirely speculation. You have no grounds for suggesting that at all.

Reply With Quote