Job Adjustments manifesto Discussion

[Karbuncle]

How about the contradiction of SE seeing us as pickpockets but doing nothing to fix steal-like abilities? And really, we never asked to be the best DDs, but being defined as utility melee job with tools that do not work makes no sense at all.

Don't sink to his level please. Let him cry and stamp his feet alone. He obvious has no clue what THFs are asking for based on his post. He just wants to complain about complaining, obviously looking to start a fight.

[Alaik]

Don't sink to his level please. Let him cry and stamp his feet alone. He obvious has no clue what THFs are asking for based on his post. He just wants to complain about complaining, obviously looking to start a fight.

Yeah, there's one of two options: he is really THAT dumb, after reading this. Or he's just an asshole trying to upset people. Either way, not worth the 2 calories it would take to type a rebuttal.

[Sparthos]

We still talking about Abyssea? How about balancing for the Voidwatch ahead?

Abyssea is already formulaic. You bring the proc jobs, WHM, TH and you're good to clear all of the content. SCH will never fit in because the class lacks all the procs BLM does.

Changing it now would do nothing but throw balance off outside Abyssea where the game is going.

SCH is much more balanced outside than it is right now when discussing Abyssea. Cure IV is viable, Stratagems actually mean something and MP conservation becomes an issue again among other things.

The class needs help with unique spells to call its own (im a fan of a Cure 4.5 variant for RDM and SCH) but balancing for Abyssea is a terrible idea. Things are just too overpowered in there to to be tailoring buffs for certain classes.

[Alaik]

People don't seem to understand that though, Sparthos.

[Korpg]

People don't seem to understand that though, Sparthos.

No, people understand, they just like to complain about nothing usually.

[Tarumage]

I used abyssea as a comparison. THF's are very viable in all endgame content today. There really is no reason for them to complain.

[Karbuncle]

I used abyssea as a comparison. THF's are very viable in all endgame content today. There really is no reason for them to complain.

That really is a very ignorant thing to say. "I think its fine so they dont need something".

The Job is not fine, every Bandwagon crybaby will go on and on about TH as an excuse to keep the job Mediocre, But i don't feel thats viable at all. We're grateful of it, But like every job, We think we deserve some other role in a party.

Even if that means we're set to control enmity.

Some people are just entirely too thick headed to see that multiple jobs need updating, and instead of understanding how one job is not perfect, they just complain about how bad their own job is and how no one else deserves anything until their job gets what they want first.

Does that apply to you? I don't know. But Truthfully outside of a few bad eggs, Most THFs are asking for nothing more than a more defined role in endgame that goes beyond Treasure hunter, Which isn't asking for a lot.

At this risk of babbling on further, I again direct you here:

http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/th...b-adjustments.

The first ~couple pages are more whining, Later on people seem to level out.Most of us anyway. You can see some real concerns the THFs have.

[Quetzacoatl]

I used abyssea as a comparison. THF's are very viable in all endgame content today. There really is no reason for them to complain.

THF is good for Limbus, Einherjar, KSNM, and Zerging?

I, sir, give you a big, fat WAT. Trust me, I have THF. I would never use it for those events.

[Tarumage]

THF is good for Limbus, Einherjar, KSNM, and Zerging?

I, sir, give you a big, fat WAT. Trust me, I have THF. I would never use it for those events.

I should have said current end game activities.

[Seha]

GUYS WARRIORS HAVEN'T HAD A RESPONSE YET!!! D: