AF3 +3

[Miiyo]

_____________________________

[TybudX]

This is why people don't transfer to Carbuncle.

[Miiyo]

This is why people don't transfer to Carbuncle.

Yeah, I do hear alot of other servers are kinda slow. If you go look at the consensus you'll see we're top 2 in Empyrean armor and we have much less people. We're just all ready for the next challenge. Then there's our rank 3rd in empyrean weapons, tied for second for mythic... yeah, there's obviously some bad stuff going on @ Carbuncle server.

[Leonlionheart]

OP talks like this is going to happen.

It would be rather inconsistent with the rest of the trials to upgrade AF3,

that and I don't have any AF1 or AF2 other than blu body and hands, not anymore anyway.

[Malacite]

Personally I was disappointed when I saw that AF3 stops at +2. I was really hoping that for once we would have a viable set (and I mean set, not just a few pieces) of AF for end game. I don't think 99 gear will eclipse AF3+2, but it's bound to be better.

Who knows though, they could always rename it or something for the +3/+4 version similar to how voidwatch gear goes from NQ -> +1 -> Different Name. And if they leave it as is, well, at least for once we got some truly useful (for the most part) AF.


I still think SE should have made the Lancer's Helm replace both AF & Relic helms with a combined effect. No meditate mod on Unkai also made me sad in the pants

[Dragoy]

Just a thought I had: Call the items with their in-game names? ^^;

As in: Artifact, Relic, Empyrean.
Just a thought...


Perhaps it's just me, but this would make it easier to read/think about these neat ideas. ^^
Neat.

[Leonlionheart]

Just a thought I had: Call the items with their in-game names? ^^;

As in: Artifact, Relic, Empyrean.
Just a thought...


Perhaps it's just me, but this would make it easier to read/think about these neat ideas. ^^
Neat.

Yes, let's all spend our time typing out the entire names.

The rest of us here on earth can say AF1 (Artifact) AF2 (Relic) and AF3 (Empyrean).

Burden other people because you can't be bothered to blend in

[Zyeriis]

Yes, let's all spend our time typing out the entire names.

The rest of us here on earth can say AF1 (Artifact) AF2 (Relic) and AF3 (Empyrean).

Burden other people because you can't be bothered to blend in

It's hard to use AF, RLC (or REL), and EMP instead right? Oh, my bad, that would make too much sense and a second of thought about how to abbr. things is too hard.

Let's just go with that idiotic and misleading af1 (artifact weapon not artifact set), af2 (level 52 artifact armor piece), and af3 (level 54 artifact armor piece). Those are far less confusing and aren't terminology for completely different things.

Burden other people because you can't be bothered to use correct terminology.

[Tagrineth]

It's hard to use AF, RLC (or REL), and EMP instead right? Oh, my bad, that would make too much sense and a second of thought about how to abbr. things is too hard.

Let's just go with that idiotic and misleading af1 (artifact weapon not artifact set), af2 (level 52 artifact armor piece), and af3 (level 54 artifact armor piece). Those are far less confusing and aren't terminology for completely different things.

Burden other people because you can't be bothered to use correct terminology.

Yeah, AF1/2/3 maybe at one point referred to weapon/1st piece/last piece (lol you don't even know your history, the "AF3 quest" is the last piece of your set), but even with people at the level 75 cap a lot of people referred to relic gear as AF2... because the old designations for the AF1 set had become obsolete.

Terminology for things like this can change over time as certain things become obsolete, this is one example. Nothing is wrong here, except maybe YOU being too stubborn to accept change/advancement.

[Zyeriis]

Yeah, AF1/2/3 maybe at one point referred to weapon/1st piece/last piece (lol you don't even know your history, the "AF3 quest" is the last piece of your set), but even with people at the level 75 cap a lot of people referred to relic gear as AF2... because the old designations for the AF1 set had become obsolete.

Terminology for things like this can change over time as certain things become obsolete, this is one example. Nothing is wrong here, except maybe YOU being too stubborn to accept change/advancement.

Terminology isn't obsoleted by other completely unrelated terminology (that has absolutely no tie in to the original content). Also, it didn't refer to the quests, as you got 3 pieces from a single quest (AF4, 5, and 6 as the third storyline quest wasn't always the same gear slot or level for that matter). Just because you got it wrong then, and are misusing the terminology now, don't come barking at me about it.

Also, I know people refered to relic as af2, and they were equally idiotic and wrong. Terminology doesnt become obsolete because a bunch of idiots don't know the correct terminology. Only thing wrong here would be people like you who refuse to use the correct terminology for whatever delusional "rebellious" "reason".

"It's easier to say af3!" No, it is not any easier than saying emp, it requires the same amount of key input (3 keys). It's pathetic how people try to defend wrong terminology just to make themselves not sound like morons (its ironic too).

Maybe if it wasn't called empyrean and was called artifact, you (and anyone else who mistakingly calls it af3) would actually have a leg to stand on. But it isn't, so you don't.

/waits for the report button spam.