
Originally Posted by
Fiarlia
While this guy is obviously trolling, his point is still valid. Even casting a Cure spell, you'd need more than 5 lines (on most jobs) to equip your maximum Cure Potency set. After that if you're casting any other spell without changing your gear sets you're not performing as well as you could be. The only spells I can think of that are acceptable to cast in Cure Potency gear besides Cure spells are statless spells (like a good amount of buffs, Dia (1/2/3) and so on) and only if you don't have Haste or Fast Cast gear for the applicable slots (perhaps -Enmity, -SIR, and Conserve MP to a lesser extent, but in most cases those stats are negligible and not worth carrying around extra gear for).
And forget using latent gear like Sorcerer's Ring, Medicine Ring, Minstrel's Ring and so on, or Elemental Obi's/Twilight Cape/Zodiac Ring.
Hell, even if by some miracle of chance you can get away with 5 lines of gearswaps in one macro and be performing at your best (read: extremely unlikely), you should still be hitting 2-3 macros per spell unless you're casting with literally no break between spells, in which case add the extra 1-2 macros at the very end, after the last spell you cast when you get a break. Why 2-3 (or an extra 1-2 at the end of spamming)? One for the spell itself, and then 1-2 after the spell completes to equip your idle set; Refresh/Regen/PDT/MDT/Movement gear (which should probably be more than 1-2 macros, but I'm willing to accept simply Refresh gear in a mages set). Some would argue that an extra macro at the beginning to equip Fast Cast gear should be included as well.
I don't care if you don't have access to windower/its plugins/its extended macro possibilities, Bubeeky, you are not performing as well as you could be.
And before you get all hostile, I'm not flaming you. I doubt we'll ever interact so your lack of striving for perfection really doesn't affect me. Even if we did interact in-game, I don't actually expect perfection of everyone, or anyone for that matter, except myself. I'm not saying you're a gimp for this, but if you think you are performing optimally or even adequately, you, sir, are extremely mistaken. Just the little bit above are clear and perfect examples of how you could better yourself if you so desired, all without the use of windower, and believe me, there are many more examples I didn't list because I'm aware that this post will go in one eye and out the other and be taken as an attack and likely responded to in kind or just outright ignored. People that argue and use the points you do rarely want to improve themselves and take any advice/recommendations/pointers as offense.