Please remove the option to close own threads.

[Raxiaz]

Your comment towards Katz was really uncalled for. I'm a mutual party in this and I don't care for either one of you two, but I can point out an immature comment when I see one. It was also "adding fuel to the fire" as you just so articulated yourself...

Do people even read what they post any more?

[Cream_Soda]

I gave katz my genuine feelings

[Karbuncle]

Your comment towards Katz was really uncalled for. I'm a mutual party in this and I don't care for either one of you two, but I can point out an immature comment when I see one. It was also "adding fuel to the fire" as you just so articulated yourself...

Do people even read what they post any more?

Once again you are being hypocritical. You say your words with the illusion of consideration then add a sarcastic insulting comment at the end which is very much fuel to the fire. You go to say how its stupid when people result to unnecessary comments, Then add little quips and insults to the end of your posts.

Which in itself is an uncalled comment. hence hypocrisy.

besides the first half of my post was more in general to all posters, Only the last like, 3 sentences was in regards to you.

That being said, I was only pointing out the fact he basically blocked Korpg for responding to him in quotes. I may be reading his post wrong but it sounded like "I asked you to stop quoting me and you didnt so im blocking you now".

So I, Jokingly, told him basically "Oh oh me next!". I was just pointing out the absurdity of blocking someone for quoting them. However, I do not know their backstory, So i could be interpreting this wrong. I read the forums often but i rarely read back-and-forth arguments spanning multiple pages to their fullest.

Either way, It felt like, from reading, He blocked someone from quoting him. Which i found an absurd act.

[Raxiaz]

You are interpreting it wrong.

And there is no such thing as "joking" on the Internet. You may as well go back to middle school mentality when posting on the Internet. Anything you think is "made in fun" and "just teasing" may as well be bullying on here.

[Karbuncle]

You are interpreting it wrong.

And there is no such thing as "joking" on the Internet. You may as well go back to middle school on the Internet. Anything you think is "made in fun" and "just teasing" may as well be bullying on here.

I interpreted it quite right if you ask me. You basically accused me of spouting nonsense I don't read, which in itself as an unnecessary/uncalled for comment just as much as anything i said. Simple hypocrisy.

And yes, Despite belief you can joke on the internet. rather its funny is subjective. Point being, I was pointing out the absurdity of blocking someone for using a forum function (Blocking) with the sarcasm of asking him to please block me next. I honestly did expect him to block me however, it does not change the fact it was sarcasm.

Joking/Sarcasm has always been a gray area for me when it comes to humor. If done right, i found sarcasm can be funny, even to the receiving end. however I found it works more when the two in question are friendly with eachother. Which means it may not have come across friendly to him.

I won't deny my intentions were to call him out on his absurd action. But as i said, I could be misunderstanding WHY Korpg was blocked. Which could easily be solved by katz himself.

Edit: And i wouldn't go as far to say sarcastically asking someone to block me in an attempt to point out the absurdity of blocking someone for responding using the Quote function is cyber-bullying.

Edit2: And my intent wasn't bullying in any way, Again, It was simply to point out the absurdity of blocking someone for using the quote function/replying. Which is what i interpreted his act as.

[Raxiaz]

You're still adding fuel to the fire so you ARE being a hypocrite, more so than me. You seem to have put more thought into your pennyarcade revelation than you did in your "joking" comment spawned from misinterpretation of events (i.e. naivety or ignorance). Your "joking" comment makes you look weak-minded and hypocritical to me.

At least when I say something I stand by it, rather than calling it a "joking statement."

Addendum: It doesn't matter if your joke wasn't meant to be interpreted as bullying. Tell that to the kids who were shot at some school because they bullied some kid and they thought it was "all in fun." Be careful what you say everywhere you are, internet or not, because it might just come back to bite you in the ass someday.

There's nothing stopping anyone from taking what you say the wrong way.

[Karbuncle]

And give me time to edit posts before responding, geez. I rarely get everything i need to say out on the first type through. My thought process involves much editing...

I find i never get my thoughts through clearly the first time around. I end up revising my statement several times before I'm happy with how its conveyed. Even remove whole paragraphs.

[Raxiaz]

I never called it "cyber-bullying", I was making a reference to an event (in real life) that may be "made in fun" for some but really "bullying" to another. On the Internet, we call this "trolling," or rather, what you were doing is called "trolling." You're inciting flames from another user by provoking them with your comment.

[Karbuncle]

You're still adding fuel to the fire so you ARE being a hypocrite, more so than me. You seem to have put more thought into your pennyarcade revelation than you did in your "joking" comment spawned from misinterpretation of events (i.e. naivety or ignorance). Your "joking" comment makes you look weak-minded and hypocritical to me.

At least when I say something I stand by it, rather than calling it a "joking statement."

Yes, But even if we're both hypocrites doesn't make you less of a Hypocrite is what I'm saying. You denied being hypocritical, that doesn't sound like standing by your statement to me.

I am standing by my statement, Just because you don't believe me does not mean I am not. I've been very clear on why i said what i said. I used Sarcasm to point out an absurd action. Sorry if its too complex for you to understand. Actually read what i said, Joke/sarcasm was a gray area, I admit i worded my first response wrong, "Sarcasm" was a better word than "Jokingly". I've corrected this.

And i've already accepted i am ignorant of the events taken place between Korpg and Katz, You pointing out something I've already said adds no more relevance to it.

I never called it "cyber-bullying", I was making a reference to an event (in real life) that may be "made in fun" for some but really "bullying" to another. On the Internet, we call this "trolling," or rather, what you were doing is called "trolling." You're inciting flames from another user by provoking them with your comment.

I deny it as trolling. My post was not an attempt to piss people off by purposefully saying something that would enact the most negative responses. That is trolling. My intent was never to "Incite" Flames. Simply to point out it was absurd to block someone for quoting them.

If i was trolling, your comment on asking me if i even read my posts is trolling as well. Fair is fair, by your logic anyway, that was a Trolling comment, Because to me i saw no other reason to say it but to insult me.

[Raxiaz]

Where did I say I denied being hypocritical? Point that part out to me, please.

And pointing out that you were ignorant of it doesn't change the fact that you are ignorant of it and shouldn't have made a comment on something that you know little to nothing about, just your own experiences with both users. It would have avoided this whole debate.

The way you worded it is clearly provoking the user and you are thus "trolling." It doesn't matter how you view it on the Internet, it matters how others view it.