Originally Posted by
Gotterdammerung
It had to be added in later because being uncapped is part of being a monster. Monsters arent capped in any area we have plenty of NMs that show examples of this, and on top of that we have them saying "pets are monsters" and at one time we were able to bring pets to a 100% stat. Put those 2 together and we have a defined function of a monster
Monsters do not have caps.
By adding in a Pet DT cap you have now knocked it out of the monster category because it no longer meets the criteria for being a monster.
It might sound like im arguing against the DT cap. IM NOT. We have alredy had that battle and lost.
Im pointing out that SE cant use the excuse "pets are monsters so if we change this about pets we have to change it about all monsters" argument anymore. They have already showed us that when they want to they can seperate the rules that govern monsters and the rules that govern pets. So there is no reason they cant fix the targeting issue of "fight" (for god sakes its an ability that tells the monster attack THIS target, then the pet proceeds to ignore you) And there is no reason they cant allow pets to skillchain with everyone (or at least the master).
Personally, I would rather they just man up and say "we dont want to do it." Or "its too much work so no thanks" or just plain "no."
I find the current flawed logic they have thrown at us a little annoying.