Originally Posted by
RAIST
It's not about me being correct, it's about making sure things are accurate. Some things weren't accurately stated about how it was possible to hold a pending charge without it actually going through, and how C&B used to do it in the past. It's interesting to note I don't see you jumping on another poster that gave evidence that this in fact is the way C&B used to do it--especially as that poster also regularly posts details to try to correct inaccurate statements.
Once those points about the pending charges were clarified, I considered the matter closed--points were challenged, and shown to be accurate. I only made one more post about it as it appeared someone may not have caught what Alhanelem's post may have meant to clarify--and that included what was basically a recap of the corrected issues that had been under debate.
At least we acknowledged things are being done differently now and the charges are actually going thorugh--never even challenged that. It looks more like you may be the one not willing to acknlowedge you may have been mistaken on facts that you challenged, and are just refusing to let it go.