Ok, then who's the judge? Peirs are not an option as it adds bias.
Printable View
Ok, then who's the judge? Peirs are not an option as it adds bias.
Last I checked, people have been pretty satisfied with the recent stuff SE has been putting into the game, so I think the plea to "listen to the players more" is kinda misplaced because... well... they are kinda already doing a good job at it.
Here's a list of things to consider when defining a good idea:
1. Proper spelling
2. Proper punctuation
3. Lack of use of internet shorthand (rly, u, 2, OMGBBQWTFLOL)
4. Writing in complete sentences
5. Poster has at least a Master's Degree from an accredited university
6. $50
7. Three marbles, a four leaf clover, and a bit of string
8. Post looks like it wasn't made by a five year old and is comprehensible and to the point
Some of those suggestions might not be needed (I recommend the $50 brib.... entry fee, and demand a cut of the action), but overall, 8 should be a given.
But the internet encourages the opposite of 1, 2 and 8 more then anything. lol
You violated rule three. You do not have a good idea.
You have more errors in that post than the use of "lol".
Who is to say that the DEV's are not players? I have seen on here a few times not the DEV stating something is a good idea & he has also had trouble with it. This implies that they DO play the game. Just like the GM's. most of them did play the game, when it was released, this has changed a bit over the years but for the most part I am sure that they chose a DEV team that have accomplished alot in game & have personal experience.
Ugh, never mind. The whole lot of you are hopeless.