Voidwatch Final Chapter

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Karbuncle

I'm just happy Bully will be a proc :( THF's first and only Unique proc.

---

And we'll still be useless. ;_;

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sapphire

And we'll still be useless. ;_;

---

lol yes sadly.

IDK, Now i don't feel as useless going on THF. I can already parse high amongst the ocean of mediocrity, now i'll have a random use :D

No adjustment on Blue Magic? :c

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Karbuncle

IDK, Now i don't feel as useless going on THF. I can already parse high amongst the ocean of mediocrity, now i'll have a random use :D

---

Why go THF at all though? You're just gimping the rest of the alliance when you could be going a more useful job. Don't get me wrong, I bring THFs every now and then, but it's only to fill a gap if I really can't find anyone else.

The problem with bringing jobs like pup, thf ect they don't do as much damage as other and make the fights harder. No matter what you can't have all the procs which is why you have to give some up.

(I use the word "you" a lot, Its not meaning "YOU" directly, But as a general term for the playerbase, So don't take it personally Helel, None of it is intended as a direct insult to you)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Helel

Why go THF at all though? You're just gimping the rest of the alliance when you could be going a more useful job. Don't get me wrong, I bring THFs every now and then, but it's only to fill a gap if I really can't find anyone else.

---

THF is ultimately useless as a whole, Luckily in voidwatch, Killspeed is never a do or die factor, and I tend to go with people who don't suck, therefor we can afford to bring a THF and not fail like a sack of crap like most of the mediocre groups do. In most occasion, I'm on SMN though, Which i don't mind, Because it has more procs.

If bringing 1 THF in place of say, a WAR, is causing your groups to fail, your groups suck beyond the help of what 1 more WAR would give, and theres no fixing that.

Still that said, Theres a lot of useless jobs in Voidwatch that you could bring a long cause it doesn't much matter. Theres some fights where I won't come THF (Botulus, Bismarck) Because I'm just not going to overcome their ridiculous def and over-all just be a waste of a spot, however, on most Voidwatch, T1-3 Jeuno, Etc, Basically anything pre-99 Cap, Only a moron would worry about Perfecting party spots, when in reality, all you have to do is cover basic procs, and fill the rest of the alliance with filler DD who aren't complete retards.

THF Is really no slouch on DD, Its not going to keep up with a good WAR or SAM, But if its the deciding factor on winning vs losing, I think you should look at the rest of your group and seriously consider why you suck so bad that bringing a THF is going to make you fail a run, and spend less time blaming the THF.

That said, Would like to mention, I own Mandau, and a Mandau THF/WAR will wreck a good chunk of DD Short of Empyrean/Relic WAR/DRG/DRK/SAM (I.E the heavier DDs).

The job is definitely second place, but unless Killspeed is Do or Die, Like in Neo-Nyzul, Its something that shouldn't be considered a Nail-in-the-coffin. Problem with THF is that its a very high-maintenance job. Requires a lot of work to break into the middle of the dd "Pack". So inviting a THF is really a gamble.

Again, on some voidwatch fights, its better to avoid THF.. Botulus, Bismarck, the really high-DEF / Phys Resistant ones, Its a dead job there. But on the lower tier stuff (Again, Really anything pre-99 Cap), only a fool would think THF is going to kill the run.

As someone who's usually on SMN for VW, I'm reallly glad about the BP adjustment for procs. Nothing is more annoying than having to cycle through six or seven BP for one weakness only to have the avatar die/be slept/stunned/amnesiac/etc before the BP goes off for half of them. Coupled with 45 second BP recast, the mob is usually dead before you ever figure out which BP it was. Now, at least for Chapter four, I'll know which BP to spam endlessly hoping it will go off!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Karbuncle

I'm just happy Bully will be a proc :( THF's first and only Unique proc.

---

I don't feel like this is something to be happy about. THF is still useless now, but borderline useless, as it has one unique proc now. All it means is that there's one more proc you won't be able to get, because THF still won't be chosen for VW with just Bully in its arsenal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arcon

I don't feel like this is something to be happy about. THF is still useless now, but borderline useless, as it has one unique proc now. All it means is that there's one more proc you won't be able to get, because THF still won't be chosen for VW with just Bully in its arsenal.

---

You'll take a win, No matter how small, When you're as neglected and useless as THF :( - I've long since given up hope of SE ever really improving THF, And in a few days, I won't really care at all.

But I know you'll keep fighting the good fight Arcon :D

Speaking as a SMN who dreaded getting Darkness procs, thank you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Karbuncle

If bringing 1 THF in place of say, a WAR, is causing your groups to fail, your groups suck beyond the help of what 1 more WAR would give, and there's no fixing that.

---

Considering the design approach, gearing and "high maintenance" as you put it, I don't see how you are pining the blame on something other than the way THF (in this case) is designed. That'd be like me saying a group bringing a melee RDM is wiping because the group sucks and is not fault of RDM's lacking melee model and dependency on buffs.

Maybe it's because I've been in those situations where that one spot makes the difference (not in FFXI, but the worries and outcomes are the same regardless of game), but the concerns are warranted. VW's approach supports DPS races, which carries implications that negatively affect certain jobs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zubis

Speaking as a SMN who dreaded getting Darkness procs, thank you.

---

If it's not HQ or EX, it's not worth trying for. lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Prothscar

No adjustment on Blue Magic? :c

---

This.

Nothing like wasting half of the fight hanging back waiting on magic cooldown because people keeping calling out hints for spells you just unslotted to slot in other ones that have been called...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Prothscar

No adjustment on Blue Magic? :c

---

For every two or three people made happy, at least one person has to remain sad. Blue Magic isn't nearly as bad as trying for a wyvern or jug-pet proc, but making one's self useless (to varying degrees) outside of procs seems way worse than losing a single Category II merit to Blind II or such.

I often think that there is an in-joke specific to the Final Fantasy XI Development Team that is very similar to a well-known joke. The only difference is the title said at the end is "Balance!" rather than "The Aristocrats!"

Extremely welcome adjustments. Hopefully less unlucky fights where too many high or extreme procs are problematic ones. However...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Prothscar

No adjustment on Blue Magic? :c

---

...disappointed with this. I fear all the constant spell swapping us BLUs have been doing will cause our minds to crumble to the beast within. New voidwatch feature: overstrained BLUs turn into Soulflayers and attack the alliance.

How about those drain/aspir/absorb type spells on undead? Any response on that? Not being able to get a proc cause you don't have the right job is one thing, but not being able to get a proc cause a mob's immune? I mean come on! Same deal with say, stun. If something's going to be allowed to come up as a proc, it shouldn't be something the mob is immune to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Karbuncle

But I know you'll keep fighting the good fight Arcon :D

---

Oh, fo' church. Just saying this isn't the salvation we've all been hoping for (and secretely still do).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zubis

Speaking as a SMN who dreaded getting Darkness procs, thank you.

---

Indeed, that was quite a painful thing to do, as well as other pet procs (especially wyvern breaths, nothing like a completely random chance to proc, during which time your wyvern will most likely die).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Duelle

Considering the design approach, gearing and "high maintenance" as you put it, I don't see how you are pining the blame on something other than the way THF (in this case) is designed.

---

Hi, You must be new here. let me introduce myself. I'm the one man campaign for "Thief sucks and is a dead job thats completely backseat and worthless to just about every other job".

Nice to meet you.

Quote:

---

That'd be like me saying a group bringing a melee RDM is wiping because the group sucks and is not fault of RDM's lacking melee model and dependency on buffs.

---

I'm going to go with "no", Unless sometime recently THF became a buffer. THF brings nothing to the table that will win or lose a fight. Its neither useful, nor important enough to cause a group to wipe, Like say, Not hasting or curing would. Decent analogy, But not even remotely close.

Quote:

---

Maybe it's because I've been in those situations where that one spot makes the difference (not in FFXI, but the worries and outcomes are the same regardless of game), but the concerns are warranted. VW's approach supports DPS races, which carries implications that negatively affect certain jobs.

---

I'm going to refer you once again to my first sentence. Maybe you ignored everything I said regarding how i feel THF is useless, high maintenance, and very difficult to gear or even properly utilize to even become a half-mediocre DD, but absolutely nothing i said should have given you the Idea that i somehow thought THF should be used in voidwatch.

My point, Which i blame only myself for not making it clear enough, is that a single Thief should never make or break an entire alliance in a Voidwatch event. Theres just absolutely no conceivable reason why it could happen. Unless he did something stupid like, AoE the adds And MPK the group. THF is not a buffer, They're a mediocre DD. If you're losing, Its not just the Thief, The idea is, its all of the mediocre DD you have. Just because it says "WAR99" doesn't mean its dealing damage.

What I was trying to convey was, Replacing a WAR with a THF shouldn't cause you to fail unless the rest of your group is so slacking that extra umph was the win. In which case, You need to re-evaluate your Alliance structure before you point fingures at the THF. The THF is likely a wasted spot, But he would not be the entire problem, and any group worth their oxygen could stand to have a THF in their alliance.

Hopefully, Repeating myself in circles (I know i did), Explained it a little clearer. Sorry!

Another voice here for BLU spell changes please! 4 spells, per element, with the delay to setting them is way too much, even if you just reduce it to two spells per elements (and none of these debuff ones!) I think everyone will be much happier. Right now BLU wastes far too much time locked out of their spells.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Karbuncle

Hi, You must be new here. let me introduce myself. I'm the one man campaign for "Thief sucks and is a dead job thats completely backseat and worthless to just about every other job".

Nice to meet you.



I'm going to go with "no", Unless sometime recently THF became a buffer. THF brings nothing to the table that will win or lose a fight. Its neither useful, nor important enough to cause a group to wipe, Like say, Not hasting or curing would. Decent analogy, But not even remotely close.



I'm going to refer you once again to my first sentence. Maybe you didn't read, Or just ignored everything I said regarding how i feel THF is useless, high maintenance, and very difficult to gear or even properly utilize to even become a half-mediocre DD, but absolutely nothing i said should have given you the Idea that i somehow thought THF should be used in voidwatch.

My point, Which i blame only myself for not making it clear enough, is that a single Thief should never make or break an entire alliance in a Voidwatch event. Theres just absolutely no conceivable reason why it could happen. Unless he did something stupid like, AoE the adds And MPK the group. THF is not a buffer, They're a mediocre DD. If you're losing, Its not just the Thief, The idea is, its all of the mediocre DD you have. Just because it says "WAR99" doesn't mean its dealing damage.

What I was trying to convey was, Replacing a WAR with a THF shouldn't cause you to fail unless the rest of your group is so slacking that extra umph was the win. In which case, You need to re-evaluate your Alliance structure before you point fingures at the THF. The THF is likely a wasted spot, But he would not be the entire problem, and any group worth their oxygen could stand to have a THF in their alliance.

Hopefully, Repeating myself in circles (I know i did), Explained it a little clearer. Sorry!

---

I agree with you, and I have no problems inviting a THF if I'm having trouble finding other people to join. I will always invite another DD job over a THF though, and I honestly hate being biased like that, but a shitty geared SAM can at least do "some" damage, while a shitty THF is probably hitting for 0 and doing absolutely nothing. It sucks, but I'm not willing to take the risk unless I know the THF is good at their job. Same goes for DNC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Karbuncle

I'm going to go with "no", Unless sometime recently THF became a buffer. THF brings nothing to the table that will win or lose a fight. Its neither useful, nor important enough to cause a group to wipe, Like say, Not hasting or curing would. Decent analogy, But not even remotely close.

---

Containing my own degree of sarcasm, you don't seem to understand the concept of a DPS race. If there's a DPS race, that means killing the mob ASAP is top priority, which means you need the jobs/classes that yield the most DPS because otherwise something bad happens. Here it's "temps wear off between procs, mob does super damage, everyone dies" (*where applicable). Elsewhere it'd be "mob reaches rage timer, everyone dies". Same difference.

Quote:

---

Maybe you didn't read, Or just ignored everything I said regarding how i feel THF is useless, high maintenance, and very difficult to gear or even properly utilize to even become a half-mediocre DD, but absolutely nothing i said should have given you the Idea that i somehow thought THF should be used in voidwatch.

---

So which is it? THF should be fixed and be useful and be brought to events like voidwatch? Or THF be the "wasted" slot that has to be carried (even if its by a little bit) by the rest of the alliance? I may not be a THF main, but I'd be hoping for the former.

Either way, I find it odd that you are outspoken in the uselessness of THF yet don't see any drive to see it corrected. Figured we'd be on the same boat for our respective jobs.

Thf has a unique proc now huh? Now i'm as useful as a pld usually is(not very) so I guess that's something.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Duelle

Containing my own degree of sarcasm, you don't seem to understand the concept of a DPS race. If there's a DPS race, that means killing the mob ASAP is top priority, which means you need the jobs/classes that yield the most DPS because otherwise something bad happens. Here it's "temps wear off between procs, mob does super damage, everyone dies" (*where applicable). Elsewhere it'd be "mob reaches rage timer, everyone dies". Same difference.
So which is it? THF should be fixed and be useful and be brought to events like voidwatch? Or THF be the "wasted" slot that has to be carried (even if its by a little bit) by the rest of the alliance? I may not be a THF main, but I'd be hoping for the former.

---

You simply don't seem to grasp the idea of me saying that if About 4000 HP Worth of Damage over the course of the entire fight is causing your group to wipe, the issue doesn't begin with the THF. Voidwatch isn't a "DPS Race" unless you got a hot date and need to finish fast. There hasn't been a single fight I've ever done in voidwatch since its been released where i can even close to running out of time.

Speed is nothing but a luxury in Voidwatch**(Read Spoiler Below), Again, Unless your group sucks, and i redirect you to my original point. If time is such a factor in your fights 1 THF is going to ruin it, You need to re-evaluate your entire alliance before you try to pit the blame on 1 job. Because there should never be a time or situation where a single THF in place of a better DD Should be the determining Factor in winning or losing a battle.

Being caught in a situation where your entire alliance is wiping due to no fanatics and a bad placed TP move should be very rare. if you honestly think the difference between winning and losing in a situation where you run out of Temp items is another WAR, you're grasping for straws to try and maintain this incorrect assumption that 1 THF in an alliance is going to be the harbinger of doom.

In fact, having those Extra Dagger procs would be more beneficial in that situation than another WAR, because that means if Dagger proc came up, Theres that chance you'd be able to hit it. Or now, Bully.

You're wrong here, Theres no easy way to put that. I don't deny THF is a wasted spot, It has no use outside of Dagger procs and Bully, which is small and maybe you've lost the original discussion, but my only argument with you is the idea 1 single THF replacing a WAR/better DD is somehow going to cause a failed run. Which is just absurd to the point I have to assume you're trolling hard.

Quote:

---

So which is it? THF should be fixed and be useful and be brought to events like voidwatch? Or THF be the "wasted" slot that has to be carried (even if its by a little bit) by the rest of the alliance? I may not be a THF main, but I'd be hoping for the former.

---

What? I know Its a Wasted slot in pretty much all new events. Legion its got 1 spot because Treasure Hunter actually matters there. THF Is useless where Treasure Hunter has no lease. Its not that I don't want the job to go somewhere, I've just given up all hope it ever will.

Quote:

---

Either way, I find it odd that you are outspoken in the uselessness of THF yet don't see any drive to see it corrected. Figured we'd be on the same boat for our respective jobs.

---

I had plenty of drive to see it corrected.

for eight years.

For Eight years, Every time Job Adjustments came out, Even though i had MULTIPLE jobs, the only one i cared about was THF. year after year i was disappointed by the sh*t they spewed at the job. It was an uphill battle we were never destined to win.

Theres a time you gotta step back and realize your vision of a job doesn't match Square's vision. This forum is a farce when it comes to job adjustments, Nothing we suggest will ever be implemented. Go to the THF Forums, Half of the THF suggestions will be from me, Theres a THF Compilation thread, by me. I've made countless suggestions in multiple threads.

its ignored, It will never happen. A man has his limits. I love Thief, ITs my favorite job, But i acknowledge its uses and where it fails, and i also Acknowledge SE Feels Treasure Hunter is powerful enough to keep the job from being useful in any other way. They do not want to fix the job, and they will never fix the job, Because in their eyes, it does not need fixing.

I'm just simply giving up on Square Enix ever realizing or Admitting shortcomings of that king of broken jobs. SMN is still crap, RDM is still crap, and those two really are worse off than THF. maybe if RDM and SMN get fixed, my hope for THF will re-awaken, But until then, Wont happen.

Let me explain that part better. in Voidwatch, Most groups, through procing and over-all Damage while capping lights, Can easily dispatch an Enemy with just 1 DD Party. In most if not all cases, a THF Will only replace another proc'er, So to begin with, the entire idea of replacing them with "Another DD" is stupid, Because the DD Party will already be full to the brim with the 3 best DD, 2 CORs, and a BRD, so another DD is just going to be in the scrub party.

So at best THF Would replace say, a PUP, or a BST. A Proc-job.

That logical loop-whole in this whole debate aside, Speed does determine to an extent if you win or lose, But any group worth their air kill the NM Within 15 minutes of popping or less, VW allows you i think 30 minutes, 1 THF, who should be taking a proc job spot anyway, Is not going to cause a failed run.

It just will not happen. Do you understand what I'm trying to say now? The idea THF is replacing a WAR i gave to you people even though its ludicrous to assume that, no alliance is set up with 2 DD Parties. Its all the same:

Tank/DD Party (Usually 2-3WARs, 2CORs, and a BRD (WHM perhaps too)
Mage Party (Your BLM, BLU, maybe SCH, SMN)
Proc Party (Leftovers. DRG, THF, PUP, BST, etc etc)

THF would go in the proc party, because thats what they'd be there for, Procs. They're not replacing a strong DD unless your alliance leader is a moron.

So theres two strong points to why you're wrong

1) In no Alliance worth your time investment will a THF, somehow replacing a WAR, Cause a failed run.

2) In No Alliance worth your time investment should the leader ever replace a DD-Party WAR with a THF. THF Goes in the Proccer party, and is nothing but Filler.

The jobs that need updating the most atm are THF SMN RDM and maybe DNC in regards to support. IMO!

I forgot about DNC, I mentioned RDM and SMN, But yah, DNC Really is in need of some help too. I sometimes forget its even a job...

Replacing Modus Veritas with Libra was enough for that to get a "Like" out of me. Just the thought of trying to get Modus to land disgusted me, because I've had many, many times that it never did (working as intended, etc). I flat out refused to ever play Scholar after enough frustration of it (SCH JA weakness these days makes me respond with: "Owell"). Overall, I like the weakness refinement. A job ability that can stagger should NOT whiff or have no effect (Like the part about Bounty Shot being replaced as well, and I'm not even a Rng).

Removing merit stuff is nice too, people shouldn't be forced to have everything just so they're "good" for VW.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Karbuncle

You're wrong here, Theres no easy way to put that. I don't deny THF is a wasted spot, It has no use outside of Dagger procs and Bully, which is small and maybe you've lost the original discussion, but my only argument with you is the idea 1 single THF replacing a WAR/better DD is somehow going to cause a failed run. Which is just absurd to the point I have to assume you're trolling hard.

---

Believe it or not, I'm not trying to troll you. I'm speaking from my own experiences. As I said, "temps wear, super damage, everyone dies" is not that different from "mob hits rage timer, everyone dies". Either way, I'll drop this now, as the more important point lies in the below quote.

Quote:

---

For Eight years, Every time Job Adjustments came out, Even though i had MULTIPLE jobs, the only one i cared about was THF. year after year i was disappointed by the sh*t they spewed at the job. It was an uphill battle we were never destined to win.

There's a time you gotta step back and realize your vision of a job doesn't match Square's vision. This forum is a farce when it comes to job adjustments, Nothing we suggest will ever be implemented. Go to the THF Forums, Half of the THF suggestions will be from me, Theres a THF Compilation thread, by me. I've made countless suggestions in multiple threads.

its ignored, It will never happen. A man has his limits. I love Thief, ITs my favorite job, But i acknowledge its uses and where it fails, and i also Acknowledge SE Feels Treasure Hunter is powerful enough to keep the job from being useful in any other way. They do not want to fix the job, and they will never fix the job, Because in their eyes, it does not need fixing.

I'm just simply giving up on Square Enix ever realizing or Admitting shortcomings of that king of broken jobs. SMN is still crap, RDM is still crap, and those two really are worse off than THF. maybe if RDM and SMN get fixed, my hope for THF will re-awaken, But until then, Wont happen.

---

I guess what separates you and I is the border between reasonable and stubborn. I wouldn't exactly call the forums a sham, though I agree that the developers seem to have returned to their castle in the clouds where us mere mortals cannot tread or reach them. I now understand your frustration, and if I were less stubborn I'd probably would have given up hope too.

I hope this is not too much to ask for, but while your already making the trigger system for pet jobs easier...

I think im speaking for alot of SMNs here when i humbly request that we want a clear distinguish between Fenrir and Diabolos BP triggers. on "old" VW content it only sais "darkness BP" and with recast of 45 seconds you usually only get 1-3 trys in before the monster dies ( in a good pikcup or LS party) so its especially hard to find the right BP in time. Thanks for the consideration.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Windwhisper

I hope this is not too much to ask for, but while your already making the trigger system for pet jobs easier...

I think im speaking for alot of SMNs here when i humbly request that we want a clear distinguish between Fenrir and Diabolos BP triggers. on "old" VW content it only sais "darkness BP" and with recast of 45 seconds you usually only get 1-3 trys in before the monster dies ( in a good pikcup or LS party) so its especially hard to find the right BP in time. Thanks for the consideration.

---

I doubt they will as it's no where near as ridiculous as BST's restrictions.

So I notice that no one is talking about the merit spells & abilities. RDM & NIN will take a big hit with this. Especially RDM.

While NIN will still have Katana procs, the spells can be done any job /NIN.

RDM is losing the T2 enfeebs. While they have a better shot at landing them these spells can still be done by other mages.

I agree with SMN, PUP, & BST adjustments though. They were kinda needed lol. THF adjustments are nice.

Quote:

---

the spells can be done any job /NIN.

---

I think Yurin is a proc isn't it? if not, yah, all can be done /NIN, But it'd be a b*tch and a half to land the Debuffs XD.

I think they removed Merit spells for the reason that they weren't very fair in the first place. I know a few jobs lose exclusiveness with it, but I merited 5/5 N.T.E and 5/5 Hyoton back in the day, I planned on keeping them.

RDM is hit the hardest i think. But RDM is already dead, So its like they're just kicking the body now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kindra

So I notice that no one is talking about the merit spells & abilities. RDM & NIN will take a big hit with this. Especially RDM.

While NIN will still have Katana procs, the spells can be done any job /NIN.

RDM is losing the T2 enfeebs. While they have a better shot at landing them these spells can still be done by other mages.

I agree with SMN, PUP, & BST adjustments though. They were kinda needed lol. THF adjustments are nice.

---

It's true they take a hit, but Merit spells should NEVER have been a weakness, the whole premise was merit the job how you played it (admittedly VERY badly implemented) and becoming a weakness spell meant you needed 1/1 in all despite the limited spaces.

That statement about RDM is dead on lol. Yurin and Aishia Ichi are both procs. And yes I agree /nin skill lvls will make it very hard to proc with. But still it's a hard hit for both of those jobs.

The AM 2's being taken out isn't a bad thing for BLM's though lol. 1 less spell they have to worry about per element.

Greetings!

With the version update that has taken place today, we have implemented the final chapter of Voidwatch as well as the content that was mentioned previously.

※We have found a bug where when using the periapt of sapience key item in the final chapter of Voidwatch, familiar and automaton weakness triggers will not be displayed correctly. Specifically, the hints for familiars and automatons will be displayed as they would originally. The displayed hints are still not updated and “Sheep Charge” and “Armor Shatterer” will be the only options needed to exploit weaknesses as stated last week.


Now them, on to some answers to questions we have been seeing.

• Temporary items
There have been some of you who are worried about whether temporary item distribution would be eliminated or not. There will be no changes to this. Besides the listed changes, the effects will be the same as always.

• Automaton weakness option
All of the previous options have been consolidated to only the Sharpshot frame weaponskill “Armor Shatterer”, making only one option for automatons to exploit an enemy’s weakness.

• Other familiar pets besides sheep
Since the Voidwatch participation level is 75 and we did not want to have a jug that cost too much, as a result of comparing the higher level pets for that level, we decided to pick Nazuna. However, this is something that can be changed. We’d like to look in to this based on your feedback, so if you have an opinion please let us know. (It won’t make it in time for the final chapter, but we would like to look into it for the future of existing Voidwatch content.)

• Voidwatch key item category
If possible we would like to address this in the next version update. We will be sure to let you know any information on implementation timing once we know.

• Making blue alignment and red alignment max at the beginning
This is currently only at the brainstorming phase, but this is one of the things we are thinking about to help low man groups and also players that get into Voidwatch later.

• Exchange tickets (name pending)
We are currently finalizing the specifications and will be able to announce some information in the very near future. We will be refining the exchangeable items to those that are difficult to obtain.

• Enfeebling magic resistance
Not only for Voidwatch, but for all battle content, we are proceeding with the enfeebling magic adjustments mentioned previously.

We will continue to make adjustments to existing Voidwatch content moving forward, so please continue to submit your feedback.

Thanks for all the wonderful information! Glad to know the ticket system will be coming soon. Hopefully they've considered adjusting it to not be a pointless 2-month long waste of development time.

One quick request, Can you ask them to allow Treasure Hunter break the hard cap on Red and Blue? That would be lovely :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camate

• Making blue alignment and red alignment max at the beginning
This is currently only at the brainstorming phase, but this is one of the things we are thinking about to help low man groups and also players that get into Voidwatch later.

---

Double PD zerg go. Better later than never.

im waiting for the auto cap system. Ive always said getting 12 other people to get items from mobs defeatable by a party of 6, sucks. Well the later VW tiers are probably not 6- manable, but I personally 6-manned all chapter 1 and many of the first two tiers of jeuno, with hardly any trouble ( for Win purpose).

People say THF is useless as a DD in VW, but putting out Consistant 3-4k Mercy Strokes (stacked of course) and around 2-2.5k Exenterator's on PIL for example isnt too shabby. I seen SAM's do worse (of course they build TPfaster but we dps faster and for the hitting for 0, thats a joke right?) :s

I agree THF needs some serious revising, but when i WS for 3-4k on Pil im pretty happy with that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Karbuncle

I forgot about DNC, I mentioned RDM and SMN, But yah, DNC Really is in need of some help too. I sometimes forget its even a job...

---

Eh, as long as Dynamis currency works the way it does, DNC will probably remain a job worth putting time into.