Raise the minimum allowable job level in Abyssea from 30 to 70+

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ramsos

Actually he is 100% correct. If I'm am doing 75%+ of an 18 man alliances damage, what is the differance between a lvl 30 and a 90 in full pink, at least the 30 is opening boxes.

---

This is my point exactly. Sometimes for fun I'll enter a pickup ally for about 1hr or so to cap merits and I go unfiltered just to have some fun. It's always amazing to see the guy doing 1k WSs when mine do 4.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kazen

Incorrect. I have never leeched an abyssea job before yet I'm all for abyssea leeching. You just assumed I was a leech because I'm debating for them. I'm sorry, please try again.

---

Wtf? See that "if".

"If" what? You're making no sense.

Anyways, its really borring to debate with you 2. You two seems to have no RL thats why you are 24/7 inside this forum when ffxi isnt runing.
And my GF waits and i want to take a shower anyway, i had a hard profitable work day and now i want to relax and not to debate and get flamed by ppl who can not call a rl them own.
GN

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zeitzone

You can not synch to colibris if you only can synch down to the low level in pt.

---

I think we are having a fundamental difference of population issues here. You are German, you play with the German population. I am American and play with the American population. In the American population, ever since level sync started, NO ONE did exp on anything besides collibri. No one, ever. If collibri camps were taken, you did not exp.

I dont know how the German population handled this. You guys may have just settled for less efficient camps where an American would have just decided to wait till one of the existing parties either broke or invited them. I think we are just having a fundamental misunderstanding since our populations might just act differently. Only thing I can think of.

RL card pulled? ABORT ABORT ABORT

Have a nice night hypocrite.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kazen

"If" what? You're making no sense.

---

You leech if you are the guy whos orginaly low level and profits from other persons work.

See it now?

IFFFFFFFFFF, so not "you are a nutt" but rather "you are a nutt if you dont get it yet"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ramsos

I think we are having a fundamental difference of population issues here. You are German, you play with the German population. I am American and play with the American population. In the American population, ever since level sync started, NO ONE did exp on anything besides collibri. No one, ever. If collibri camps were taken, you did not exp.

I dont know how the German population handled this. You guys may have just settled for less efficient camps where an American would have just decided to wait till one of the existing parties either broke or invited them. I think we are just having a fundamental misunderstanding since our populations might just act differently. Only thing I can think of.

---

There were alot more camps then colibri, we camped on trolls, on mamool ja, we even took Imps and flys.

And now GN, finally.

No, anyone in an ally not doing enough damage is a leech. In an 18 man group if one person is doing more than 50% of the work then everyone else there is a leech. There is nothing you can say to question this, it's just a fact. Please note I have nothing against these people at all since I don't mind any leeches. I'm more than willing to contribute 75% of the work and I'm completely ok with that. If some random dude wants to be a gimp and leech... let him.

I'm more ok with the level 30 guy opening chests as he's allowing me to further increase my overall damage and the productiveness of the party.

Zeitzone, I'm curious as to what you would think of a person who leeched their job from 30 - 90, then capped their skills, spent time getting good gear, reading up on how to play their job through the course of 2 weeks. Then is standing next to you as the same job, hitting the same mob and out damaging you. What would you say or do to this person?