Item Levels

They removed the double subscription discount too, so there's very little reason to have an active account on both other than nostalgia for XI.

I don't think they're trying to push people away from XI deliberately though- incompetence is always a much better explanation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by darkhorror

If you charm in lvl100+ gear so that a mob checks EM or less will it stay the duration of the EM or less or will it be based of actual job level vs enemy level?

Also if you call a jug pet will they be able to come out at lvl100+ if you have lvl 100+ gear or will they stay at lvl99?

---

Other level checks are not affected. You'd still charm like a 99, but it IS possible that a piece of IL112 gear has a Charm-enhancing effect so you charm as if you are lvl 112.

Level 5 Petrify might work on IL120 though :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Deifact

if FFXI went under a lot of people would lose their jobs.

---

I'm sure the company could find positions for the three people still working on FFXI.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catmato

I'm sure the company could find positions for the three people still working on FFXI.

---

If they even work on FFXI full time. I'm pretty sure they all have other primary jobs at SE and then work on FFXI as time allows (read as: when they get too drunk to drive home at happy hour and have to hang out at the office until they sober up).

To whoever said get over it?

That is a horrid way to promote FFXI to people who are already on the fence. Remember the only reason SE keeps this game going is because it's still profitable. You think the groups of people who are unmotivated, can't participate, are the fence about quitting or have quit because of the design choices would be HELPING this game if they just ignored it?

IMHO it'd hurt any game if the players don't speak up or wasn't heard. For every single player that speaks up there are many who don't. Each of those players represent money per month. Some own multiple accounts and mules. This money is used to pay the staff, upgrade the game and keep the severs running. I'm sure you know this already.

Here's a key element. You say these people who need to get over themselves because they don't like how the game is playing out. Think about it they don't have to stay if they don't like the game. By telling the fans get over it you'll only entice these players to leave more. Who's fault is this if the game isn't fun?

In heart, don't you think the game would benefit much more if it was fun and addictive for everyone instead of a boring job like environment with nothing but a long pointless grids? I'm sure if it was superior material there wouldn't be people complaining and um, quitting. I mentioned this a few times from my personal experiences.

Let's look at it from a logical perspective. These forums don't give a good poll, it's the ones who didn't speak we should be worrying about because they didn't feel motivated enough to actively speak up.

Look at these item levels they don't seem to enhance the game much. Fixes where needed elsewhere but for some reason this became a priority fix. Several people have spoken up that they don't think this change is necessary or even worth the resources invested into it. Some even pointed out that it can cause serious unforeseen issues.

Greetings,

Below is an in-depth response from Producer Akihiko Matsui in regards to content levels and item levels.

---
Matsui here.

Thanks so much for all the feedback about item levels and content levels.

I've been answering questions on this topic and have discussed this in the past, but I'd like to take this opportunity to talk more about it.

• Content Levels
  For Adoulin, we've set a basic repeating play cycle which entails procuring stronger equipment to challenge harder content, which will yield even stronger equipment.
  
  In order to indicate difficulty for Adoulin content in a way that is displayed in an objective fashion, we have established content levels.
  
  The below is a chart representation of this:
  
  <table width="600" border="0"> <tr> <td width="11%" align="center">20</td> <td width="1%" style="border-style:none;"></td> <td width="20%" align="center">Delve (Boss monsters)</td> <td width="1%" style="border-style:none;"></td> <td width="20%" style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">19</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">18</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">17</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td align="center">New Wildskeeper Reives</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">16</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">15</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">14</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td align="center">Delve (NM group 2)</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">13</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td align="center">New Skirmish</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">12</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">11</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td align="center">Delve (NM group 1)</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">10</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">9</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td rowspan="4" align="center">New Colonization/Lair Reives</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">8</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">7</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td align="center">Wildskeeper Reives</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">6</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td align="center">Skirmish</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">5</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td rowspan="5" align="center">Colonization/Lair Reives</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">4</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">3</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">2</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center">1</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center" style="border-style:none;">Content Level</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td align="center" style="border-style:none;">Up to April 2013</td> <td style="border-style:none;"></td> <td align="center" style="border-style:none;">Upcoming version updates (July and August)</td> </tr></table>
  
  
• Why not increase the level cap?
  To be extremely frank, increasing the level cap was never an option.
  
  So then what were our options?
  
  Below are the two plans:
  
  1. Expand equipment variation laterally
     This would be preserving the original style of the game up until now.
     Keeping relics, mythics, and empyreans at the top, add gear that can be used depending on the situation without creating higher tiers of equipment. No changes to the level 99 cap.
     
     
  2. Boost equipment variation vertically
     This is the current plan.
     Add equipment that surpasses relics, mythics, and empyrean. Player level cap of 99 remains unchanged, but growth takes place via equipment.
  
  I believe that there were quite a few who recall that there was a lot of feedback in the past about content difficulty and item stats not matching up, and a lot of equipment having similar stats.
  
  We had come to see the limits of continuing to expand equipment variation laterally, and due to the fact that it wouldn't be possible to change monster strength without character growth as well as the fact that it would be difficult to make a variety of exciting content, the result would turn into only expanding areas, which we did not think was desirable.
  
  As a result based on thorough discussions, while considering the current state of the game as well as the future, we decided to boost the variation of equipment vertically.
  
  There were also a number of other reasons why increasing the level cap was not added as an option.
  
  As I am sure you are all aware, increasing the level cap would cause a number of balance related issues to arise, such as whether the support jobs would remain at 49 or if they could be allowed to go higher, limitations on job abilities and job traits, and also how high the staged increases of job traits would go.
  
  Also, the current UI system used in FINAL FANTASY XI was not created for levels to go above 99, so in order to display parameters for levels over 99 it would be necessary to completely reconstruct portions of the UI.
  
  
• Items Levels I
  With a growth system that takes place via equipment, there is one large aspect that differs from what we have seen in the game up until now.
  
  The aspect is moving from two growth patterns: parameters that grow by leveling and parameters that grow from equipment, to just one: parameters that grow from equipment. As a result, equipment stats have come to look much larger; however, the fundamental thought process up until now will not be changed.
  
  Just like up until now where you would gain experience points by defeating strong monsters that you were able to challenge, level up, and continue to grow by procuring strong equipment, in Adoulin as well you'll be challenging strong monsters and content, and progressing growth by gathering powerful equipment.
  
  Put simply, due to the below reasons we've made it so the strength of equipment does not rely on the level you can equip them, but instead relies on the content level you can obtain them.
  
  • No growth from levels
  • No indicator of equipment strength via the level they can be equipped
  
  
• Items Levels II
  I'd like to go into more detail about the strength of equipment does not relying on the level you can equip them, but instead relying on the content level you can obtain them.
  
  The strength of monsters that appear in Adoulin content will be decided on the content level. (Since we will be building a solid hierarchy between content, we’re making it so just 1 level difference in content level will be extremely noticeable.)
  
  We've also calculated the necessary parameters you will need to combat these monsters and decided the stats for Adoulin equipment, which is why we've established item levels to make them references for equipment strength.
  
• The meaning behind content levels and items levels
  Basically, we would like you to use content levels and items levels as a reference when challenging content.
  
  Though it's a reference, we understand there are aspects that can be covered by certain strategies and ways of playing as well as equipment that is used/collected for their special stats and properties, so this is NOT something that is saying "you definitely cannot do this content without this item level."
  
  We'd just like this to act as a gauge where you can consider what kind of equipment you should gather and what kind of content you can go do.
  
  Amongst the equipment available before Adoulin, there were items that exceeded item level 100, and while there are aspects that make it difficult to determine, it will become easier to understand as more and more items with item levels are introduced.
  
  In regards to equipment that have augments added to them, we had originally wanted to have individual item levels depending on the specific value of the augments, but with the current system it was determined that it would be difficult, and we will be making it so the item level displayed is for the highest augment value possible. We apologize for this and appreciate your understanding.
  
  Also, similar to how we would like you to use content levels and items levels as reference, it also makes it possible for the person implementing equipment and content to grasp the strength of equipment stats and monster strength more objectively.
  
  In the event that the person implementing these things were to change, it’s extremely important for them to prepare the proper content and item stats following the content level difficulty and stat curve.
  
  As an example, as a response to feedback that mentioned content difficulty and item stats did not match, it will now become possible to accurately assess this, and it will also be possible to judge more accurately what kind of content is being implemented for a certain level, whether more variations are necessary, and what content's difficulty needs adjusting.
  
  
• Wrap-up
  
  Until now I have been talking about the concept and purpose for content levels and item levels.
  
  I'm aware that the negative feedback in regards to content levels and item levels is largely split into two categories.
  
  1. The concept of content levels does not work properly
     This is something that I discussed in a post I made last month.
     
     
     Quote:

     ---

     Originally Posted by Akihiko_Matsui

     With the release of the end of April version update, we've implemented Delve and have completed the battle content that was planned for the launch of Seekers of Adoulin.
     
     I feel that the flow of content that we planned where players would take on higher tiers of content (content level) by progressing in stages is not going as smoothly as we'd like.
     
     Specifically, I would like to adjust the fact that it's difficult to do colonization reives and lair reives in small numbers, as well as the fact that it is difficult to start Skirmish.
     
     For the time being, Delve (the boss battle) has been set as the highest content level.
     
     With this current state, I feel priorities should be placed on implementing and adjusting content for low-man or soloing more than adding further higher tier content, and I would like to work hard while heading in this direction so that a larger amount of players can enjoy the game.

     ---

     After this I also made a post about Reive adjustments, but besides only reives we will continue to make adjustments as needed to coalition assignments and other existing content. (I will make a separate post to explain about this.)
     
     
  2. It's not possible to play with a small amount of people
     I understand the need for the option of being able to play with a small amount of people as well as the need for ways to obtain new equipment with a small amount of people, and we are putting a very high priority to implement and adjust content so that it be done with a small group of players or solo over time.
     
     In the upcoming version update we will be adding support for low-manning reives and adding new equipment that can be exchanged for Bayld, as well as other ways to address this, but I would like to apologize for not being able to have these ready yet.
     
     We've also seen feedback posted which mentions that top players are clearing the high level content and seeing players obtain brand-new gear is upsetting because it's not possible to play all the time and it won't be possible to obtain that equipment.
     
     We will not be making adjustments so that equipment can be obtained at the same time and pace as the top players, but we will be adding elements where you can obtain equipment close to it by spending a bit of time, and also once some time passes we will be adjusting the content difficulty, making it easier to clear. We would like to make an environment where it's possible to play with a variety of styles.

Sorry for the lengthy post, but I hope this serves to explain about the thought process behind content levels and items levels, as well as answer the questions that have been brought up.
---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camate

Below is an in-depth response from Producer Akihiko Matsui in regards to content levels and item levels.

---

It's probably just me, but I like his new... "assertive"(?) tone.

At any rate...

Quote:

---

Also, the current UI system used in FINAL FANTASY XI was not created for levels to go above 99

---

Interesting that you added the "current" qualifier. Makes it sound like you have ideas on something further down the road.

Quote:

---

Amongst the equipment available before Adoulin, there were items that exceeded item level 100, and while there are aspects that make it difficult to determine, it will become easier to understand as more and more items with item levels are introduced.

---

I'd be curious to see what the "content level" of pre-Adoulin (and even pre-99) gear looks like, once the algorithms for determining it coalesce more. I'd be curious about this in spite of the fact that such information would have no impact on gameplay (as new gear's content level will).

Quote:

---

In the event that the person implementing these things were to change, it’s extremely important for them to prepare the proper content and item stats following the content level difficulty and stat curve.

---

This is another indicator of "taking the long view" with regards to development, which again heartens me.

Quote:

---

As an example, as a response to feedback that mentioned content difficulty and item stats did not match, it will now become possible to accurately assess this, and it will also be possible to judge more accurately what kind of content is being implemented for a certain level, whether more variations are necessary, and what content's difficulty needs adjusting.

---

Hallelujah!

All in all, I'm satisfied with what I'm hearing now, at least for the time being. Thank you.

What item level will updated REMs be and when can we expect to see those changes?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camate

So then what were our options?

Below are the two plans:

1. Expand equipment variation laterally
   This would be preserving the original style of the game up until now.
   Keeping relics, mythics, and empyreans at the top, add gear that can be used depending on the situation without creating higher tiers of equipment. No changes to the level 99 cap.
   
   
2. Boost equipment variation vertically
   This is the current plan.
   Add equipment that surpasses relics, mythics, and empyrean. Player level cap of 99 remains unchanged, but growth takes place via equipment.

---

This is exactely the big "mistake" behind all the negative feedback Seekers of Adoulin is receiving, mainly this new Item Level thing.
They're all consequences of this choice which clearly had been planned who knows how long ago and now it's way too late to revert it.

Choice number 1) would have been a much better choice and way more coherent with what FFXI has always been these past 11 years.
I've already said it but let me repeat it. People kept playing FFXI for so long because of how unique and different FFXI was compared to other MMORPGs, not because they were expecting some new game director to come and make FFXI look like another generic post-WoW MMO.
You would have been able to release new and better gear, but the differences would have been much smaller and you wouldn't have needed to adjust RMEs to this scale, you wouldn't have made old content irrelevant, leaving players a much wider choice of events to play.
I'm sure everybody noticed how people are slowly getting bored of spamming Reives and Menapo, right?

Also, this post is based on the premise that somehow the level cap HAD to be increased and Item Level was the only way.
Who says?
Really, who says?
Level cap stayed at 75 for how long, 7 years? 8 years? And still the game managed to release successful expansion packs without touching the level cap.
Why exactely was it necessary to go through all of this?
Because from Matsui's post what we get is that Level Cap had to be increased AT ALL COSTS and item level was the only option. This is preposterous.



This item level system just doesn't work, it's crappy, it doesn't fit a game like FFXI and it doesn't take into consideration the fact that people swaps gear constantly.
This is such a huge game-breaking change, I don't really see why it had to come down to this.
All the things you guys wanted to do and to achieve could have been easily achieved, to a lesser and much more fitting scale, without all these annoying changes.
Item level will never, never never possibly be an alternative to Character Level. Experience Points is something that anybody could obtain anytime with any sort of group without having to worry about it. It just took a bit of time and patience.
This will never be the same with gear, no matter how you "adjust" content and make it easier to obtain certain items a few months after content has been released.



I have no more words to express how much I feel sad and disappointed by these changes, I think I've literally lost all hope for the future of this game I've been spending so much of my life on for the past 9+ years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Camate

Greetings,

Below is an in-depth response from Producer Akihiko Matsui in regards to content levels and item levels.

---
Matsui here.

Thanks so much for all the feedback about item levels and content levels.

I've been answering questions on this topic and have discussed this in the past, but I'd like to take this opportunity to talk more about it.
[...]
Sorry for the lengthy post, but I hope this serves to explain about the thought process behind content levels and items levels, as well as answer the questions that have been brought up.
---

---

Thank you for that Mr Matsui, but I'm sure a lot of people are wondering one thing, actually: when are the R/E/M updates coming? I know in the other topic you said there would be no more yearly or 6-monthly roadmaps to prevent dissapointment, but R/E/M owners are disappointed already. Without any timeframe, it looks like nothing is being done about that. Oh, and Cait Sith, 2 years by now, was it? Without any roadmap released you are free not to bother with any long term plans for the game beyond "so what can we throw in for the next update?". As paying customers, we want to know where this game is heading to now, so that we can decide if it is still worth playing despite luckluster content being released for now. Ask any Red Mage or Rune Fencer and you'll know what I mean.