Contests for Implementing Player Suggested Content (Gear, Weapons, Quest, etc.)?

Kingfury, you mentioned Nazis. Stop posting. You've lost.

Tell you what, though. I still have a 12-page long Endgame Paladin guide that I wrote up for my linkshell in early 2010. It's all but completely obsolete now, as Paladin is essentially useless and CdC absolutely destroys Atonement. But I'd definitely be willing to post it in the PLD subforum or GD as a nostalgia bomb / informational tool. I definitely cover Enmity mechanics, which are largely unknown and misconstrued by the majority of the FFXI population.

If people really want to see a "thread contribution" from a BG mouthpiece, I'd be more than happy to oblige.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cidbahamut

Kingfury, you mentioned Nazis. Stop posting. You've lost.

---

-------------
I know what I posted, and I know you're one of the "Said posters" in question at the moment Cid. No need to add what's already in abundance to the conversation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

You mentioned Nazis. On an internet forum. Do you understand the cultural implications of what you have done?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Greatguardian

Tell you what, though. I still have a 12-page long Endgame Paladin guide that I wrote up for my linkshell in early 2010. It's all but completely obsolete now, as Paladin is essentially useless and CdC absolutely destroys Atonement. But I'd definitely be willing to post it in the PLD subforum or GD as a nostalgia bomb / informational tool. I definitely cover Enmity mechanics, which are largely unknown and misconstrued by the majority of the FFXI population.

If people really want to see a "thread contribution" from a BG mouthpiece, I'd be more than happy to oblige.

---

--------------
If it's helpful on any level, there's no need to ask about if people want to see it Gg. Just post that puppy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kingfury

---------------------
"Trying to have a debate"? Lets review these debatable topics:

•"Is it even possible for you to go even 5 minutes without stroking yourself?
(your ego)"

•"It's still easier for them to invent something on their own that works than to wade through the player's suggestions.
The junk you make alone would waste an eternity."

•"Well for one I've suggested you STOP doing this nonsense over an over in a blatant attempt to stroke your ego. Why do you think me being content to let the people I'm PAYING to make up ideas FOR me to have fun with is a crime? Sure I could say X needs to be changed but I can also say I'll go quit and play pokemon instead until the next patch. The responsibility is on THEM to make this game continue to be interesting to me and not on me to turn it into a my little pony playground.

And your argument you just posted is yet another logical fallacy since more ideas does not mean the ratio of complete and utter shit ideas vs decent/tolerable/good ones will invert itself. It merely means that the dev teams have to wade through even MORE garbage, figure out if it's even possible to do the half good ones individually, possibly let some ridiculously horrible nonsense through because at least one person in the production line wont play the game enough to realize the idea sucks, tie up resources via playtesting the ideas, and so on and so forth through the entire process."
-----------

Where's the debate in regards to the thread topic? I see tear down, after tear down, some flaming, and more tear downs. Nothing you've posted holds an ounce of respectful "debatable" criticism. In the above quoted post from you, your twisting my words and continuing the same trend.

---

So on a scale of one to ten with ten being Fuhrer rank how Nazi-like would you say that pointing out valid reasons against your ideas being implemented in addition to pointing out logic errors you are making in the unlikely event you learn not to make said logical fallacies are?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cidbahamut

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

You mentioned Nazis. On an internet forum. Do you understand the cultural implications of what you have done?

---

---------------
lol It is pretty funny that such a "Law" exist. It's pretty weak though imo, since as long as you the topic being discussed is devoid any concepts that resemble the mentality of nazi's, you should be fine. Hell, if that law was true, I would have brought up the term nazi in damn near every thread topic where the "Flame crew" popped up to spit flame in lol.

Funny though.

I don't think you seem to understand Godwin's law here. Try improving your reading level and check the wiki again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Khajit

So on a scale of one to ten with ten being Fuhrer rank how Nazi-like would you say that pointing out valid reasons against your ideas being implemented in addition to pointing out logic errors you are making in the unlikely event you learn not to make said logical fallacies are?

---

------------
Can you point out the "Valid reasons" part for me? Honestly. In everything I just posted from you, which part held respectable valid reasons geared towards the thread topic? Anything that didn't include a tear down.

The fact that you cant figure it out only proves the original quote which you're quite ironically calling trolling.