Re-Purpose Harlequin Head and Frame for Master and party Support role

[leeman]

Please Turn the Harlequin Frame. and Head into support puppet not unlike the Trust Monberaux have the puppet use more buff potions like attack, accuracy, Haste, STR DEX DEF ,MDEF, DEF ..etc.. and other boosters for the Master and Party members ...The puppet can Officially be called Chemist and be a entirely Unique roll just like Monberaux is a Unique trust.

[Sp1cyryan]

Harlequin could use adjustments, but none of these.

[leeman]

Harlequin could use adjustments, but none of these.

OK thanks for the Imput Mister Troll!

[Sp1cyryan]

OK thanks for the Imput Mister Troll!

It's not trolling.

Look, if you want to improve Harlequin. Then make Magic Mortar a dark maneuver. Double the base MP of the frame, and add an extra water capacity to the head and body each. There you go. Don't reinvent a worse wheel.

Harlequin gets MS and blunt damage, and can reasonably tank magic over Valor Edge thanks to HP and casting Shell. It is stuck with trash Magic Mortar though when using a light maneuver, which you have to for optic fiber and capping haste without a second wind maneuver. MP is stupidly low on the frame, and casting first gets in the way strobe or something triggering, which should also be adjusted.

Place emphasis on the niches of a pet, and not on making a difference job. Otherwise it is fan fiction and not an adjustment.

[Alhanelem]

It's not trolling.

Look, if you want to improve Harlequin. Then make Magic Mortar a dark maneuver. Double the base MP of the frame, and add an extra water capacity to the head and body each. There you go. Don't reinvent a worse wheel.

Harlequin gets MS and blunt damage, and can reasonably tank magic over Valor Edge thanks to HP and casting Shell. It is stuck with trash Magic Mortar though when using a light maneuver, which you have to for optic fiber and capping haste without a second wind maneuver. MP is stupidly low on the frame, and casting first gets in the way strobe or something triggering, which should also be adjusted.

Place emphasis on the niches of a pet, and not on making a difference job. Otherwise it is fan fiction and not an adjustment.


Look, he's abrasive in the way he writes, but he's right. Your idea is just some fantasy thing that doesn't in any way fit in the mold of something SE would do.There is never going to be a wholesale radical redesign of one of PUP's automaton frames. There *could*, however, maybe possibly be balance adjustments that push it towards being more useful. Still probably not, but if they were to do something, that would be a far more likely path.

[Sp1cyryan]

I don't find it abrasive at all. It is pretty mild, and people think way too much for their ideas without thinking about their ideas.

[Alhanelem]

I don't find it abrasive at all. It is pretty mild, and people think way too much for their ideas without thinking about their ideas.
Well it's abrasive in the sense that you basically just shot down their ideas without any explanation (until after being called out), so it comes across blunt and like, "ur ideas are bad gtho"

[Sp1cyryan]

Well it's abrasive in the sense that you basically just shot down their ideas without any explanation (until after being called out), so it comes across blunt and like, "ur ideas are bad gtho"

Bad ideas don't need much explanation in return. It is on them as the creator of it. Taking a response as credible or not is as well. Given how fanciful the OP was, none of it matters. In the end it is a poor idea, irregardless.

It's the whole emotional response and demands as a form of defense that is abrasive. Not the coddling of a far kinder and more mild answer to suit the other.

[Alhanelem]

Bad ideas don't need much explanation in return.Maybe not, but it doesn't make your approach less abrasive lol. If someone has a bad idea, should say why it's bad.

also ir- does not really end up changing the meaning of "regardless" and is redundant, though it is still recognized as a word in most dictionaries.

Merriam-Webster defines irregardless (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless) as "nonstandard" but meaning the same as "regardless." "Many people find irregardless to be a nonsensical word, as the ir- prefix usually functions to indicates negation; however, in this case it appears to function as an intensifier," the dictionary writes.(just poking a bit of fun here)