PDA

View Full Version : Remove Relic 119+2 Dynamis Divergence entry requirement for reforging


breakfast
06-13-2021, 08:39 AM
Remove Relic 119+2 Dynamis Divergence entry requirement for reforging +2

I don't see the point of this restriction, you don't need to actually beat anything or farm like Omen for Artifact arrmor, or Vagary for Empyrean armor, or Divergence bosses for +3.
Gwydion
06-13-2021, 01:25 PM
Well, what criteria do you suppose be used to allow this upgrade this take place? There must be something right? No requirement, means, you can make +2 relic armor without WoTG being beaten, or finishing Dreamworld Dynamis and finishing Rhapsodies too (I think). (All of these are criteria for entering Dynamis Divergence currently)
Alhanelem
06-13-2021, 01:42 PM
You should at least be eligible to enter Dyna D to be able to craft the armor.

I don't have a problem with how it is now. You couldn't get the original relic armors or even their upgrades without actually doing Dynamis.
Voidstorm
06-14-2021, 04:28 AM
You should at least be eligible to enter Dyna D to be able to craft the armor.

I don't have a problem with how it is now. You couldn't get the original relic armors or even their upgrades without actually doing Dynamis.
Sure you could. You would enter dynamis on say BRD and get gear for your say PLD without ever entering dynamis on PLD.

I'd say just make the requirement for all jobs +2 be unlocking the +3 of the same slot on any job. If that's too tough to code, then just drop the requirements altogether if they choose to change it.
Stuzey
06-14-2021, 07:20 AM
At least you didn't need to beat all the bosses with individual REMA weapons to unlock them ;)
Alhanelem
06-14-2021, 05:35 PM
Sure you could. You would enter dynamis on say BRD and get gear for your say PLD without ever entering dynamis on PLD.

I'd say just make the requirement for all jobs +2 be unlocking the +3 of the same slot on any job. If that's too tough to code, then just drop the requirements altogether if they choose to change it.

You had to do it on something. I realize that Dyna D demands the specific job, but that's not what was said here. The implication was that you shouldn't have to do dynaD at all.