Am I missing it or aren't we calculating the extra auto attacks from Sword Oath?Yes, I forget the exact origins but this is about right. The loose math goes something like this:
Imagine a full time dps stance tank has a potential multiplier of 1.
What would a full time tank stance tank do compared to a full time dps stance tank if they were a:
(1) Paladin?
Paladin Sword Oath contributes roughly 11% of their dps and experiences a tank stance penalty of 15%.
I would expect a full time tank stance paladin to do:
(1-sword oath contribution)*Tank stance penalty = (1-.11)*.85 = .7565 times the amount of damage of a full time sword oath paladin. This is a slight upper bound since we are also losing some sheltron casts and therefore some shield swipe casts, this is likely very small and the true numbers is probably close to .75.
They really add up over time.
Or was that part of the 11%?
http://king.canadane.com
Sword Oath is the 11% (.11) which I subrtract off before applying the tank stance multiplier. I don’t think sword oath does “extra auto attacks” and more just adds damage for each auto attack you do, but if this is not what you mean if you could explain alittle more what you mean I might be able to better answer the question as I might be misunderstanding it.
Last edited by Chrono_Rising; 07-09-2018 at 11:23 AM.
You are correct, it's additional damage on top of the auto attack damage.
It's not an extra auto-attack per se, it's an attack of 75 potency every time you auto attack. My wording was bad there.
http://king.canadane.com
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.