They listen to us!! (Eureka)

[Alistaire]

@yami
If it's random like diadem that could be a way to add longetivity to the glamour hunting there instead of unlocking the regular restricted gear.
Who knows how many they unlock but it seemed they were taking notes about the ones we requested removed so maybe we'll get really good ones at first, I hope they start with DOH gear first.

It's not every day someone skips the 2 derailing posts not made by the author and accuses the author of derailing the thread. Nice try scapegoating trying to equalize and dissolve.

No, I read the whole thing. I'm just siding with them over you. Funny how people can make judgment calls like that.

[Ghastly]

You know, if someone helps me to link a more accurate source to help me prove my point, I'd thank them instead of griping about them. I could even learn how to link specific posts instead of the entire page.

I have no idea why you were being unnecessarily rude and defensive when everyone else was polite in pointing out the more accurate source. It's ok to be corrected.

First of all you have no merit to your accusations, I wasn't being defensive, I was pointing out that the quote was cited correctly. They contributed nothing to the topic at hand for something they can use ctrl f to find.

No, I read the whole thing. I'm just siding with them over you. Funny how people can make judgment calls like that.

You're free to make your call as am I to make mine; the difference is I can back up my calls unlike you, when you start backing up your statements we'll get somewhere.

[Kohdo]

This thread (barring the OP) is a whole new level of petty I didn't know existed.

I'm pretty hyped for the dyeable AF3 and wondering what gear has had restrictions lifted.

[Vstarstruck]

Ghastly, let me explain what they mean, and the only reason I know of it is because I got comments like this on other forums (You think this day and age this wouuldn't be an issue)

If person a has say 30 posts displayed, while person B has 10 posts displayed, and they are on a thread 30 posts long. Person B will link something from "page 2" (even your first post has a "page 3" extension shown) But for person A who has 30 posts displayed, will not see the link person B gave because a page 2 does not exist for them. What they are saying if you click the post number in the upper right hand of the post, you get the direct post link and everyone will be able see it, regardless of settings.

How come people can't explain this in detail? It is clear Ghastly has no clue what people are talking about.

[Tint]

text

even when i get linked to the exact page, i then have to go through all the posts on that page to find the one the OP mentioned. sure, the source may be correct, but linking to the specific post is a great qol thing.

especially since the quote is incomplete and to fully understand, that the lifted glamour restriction is tied to gear drops from eureka, you have to read that source.

[Legion88]

Nice, i've learned how to precisely link specific posts. Thanks.

Back to Topic:
It may be that they will introduce the jobless darksteal gear, like they mentioned some time back.
Don't ask me for a source because it's just something stuck in my head and i remember.

[SecretCrowds]

Ghastly, let me explain what they mean, and the only reason I know of it is because I got comments like this on other forums (You think this day and age this wouuldn't be an issue)

If person a has say 30 posts displayed, while person B has 10 posts displayed, and they are on a thread 30 posts long. Person B will link something from "page 2" (even your first post has a "page 3" extension shown) But for person A who has 30 posts displayed, will not see the link person B gave because a page 2 does not exist for them. What they are saying if you click the post number in the upper right hand of the post, you get the direct post link and everyone will be able see it, regardless of settings.

How come people can't explain this in detail? It is clear Ghastly has no clue what people are talking about.

Oh. People have explained and the OP knew and understood. See the last quote here. The OP insists that the people she is trying to relate information to should fit her style, instead of the other way round.

And I don't see how people trying to get her to be more accurate when relaying information she knows and others do not know as being petty either, as claimed by Kohdo. Put it this way. A new poster posts multiple times because they do not know how to bypass the 1000 character limit. Another poster tells them how to. Nothing wrong, am I right? In fact, most would be thankful to learn something better and they would edit their post to help others read it better. In this situation, the OP reacted differently instead and insists people should sift through multiple posts.

You mean this?

That's the exact link I sourced, yes.

it's not the exact same link^^

you linked to the page, Mahrze to the post on that page (to get such a link you have to press on the "#0" in the upper right corner of the post).

I quoted what the topic was to be about. You don't cite a paragraph in a book when citing. Moreover, I already quoted what was sourced. Though we can turn this into a linking 101 class if that's the agenda/priority of this thread now. I notice and know you're trying to help and don't mean it in bad faith but do we have to make it about nuance differences instead of adding to the topic at hand?

Your link took me to a page I don't have, since I have more posts per page. If you link the specific post, that alleviates this problem.

But isn't that your problem? If we bought the same book on Amazon and I cited it as Universities require it then it's up to you to adjust your Amazon app to work as it normally does/should. If believing the source is that hard in the first place.

Anyway, whatever. This is no longer worth it. I won't be making any more posts regarding this.

[Laerad3993]

Did they clarify whether or not NM are necessary for Relic progression? Couldn’t care less about anything else dropping off of them item wise.

[Ghastly]

text

It is clear you didn't read the thread at all. Anyone changing their posts per page settings are at fault here. If you bought a digital book which you could arrange differently it's up to you to change back to default. Instead some people here are getting into petty nuances just for the sake of argument

[Ghastly]

"more accurate information"

Good, about time you took your petty/disrespectful "argument" elsewhere.
Your whole agenda was basically a petty argument about you wanting "more accurate information" looking for a petty argument regardless of what the topic was about; your quotes prove that fact.