btw, attacking a person rather than their argument is a logical argumentation fallacy as well. And also, yet again, you did not pay attention to what I said. I CLEARLY in my last post quoted myself THREE TIMES saying that I wasn't opposed to H2H getting a grip like item as long as dual wielders did too. So I will say it again.... you see only what you want to see rather than what is the truth. And I never said they should recreate the game... how you take what someone says and completely twist it makes me wonder about your mental state. I just said that it was an example of poor programming. The game should have been that way in the first place. But since it isn't, we have to deal with it the way it is. Which I am fine with too.... I'm not the one trying to change the mechanics of the game... you are. And I am willing to accept the change.... but only if it is fairly distributed... which brings us to this:
You're not a programmer for SE, neither am I. For all we know it would take as much effort to allow H2H to have grips as it would be to make it so dual wielders could have grips. As for B... that doesn't make sense, they wouldn't be dual wielding if you took weapon off for grip.
It wouldn't make a difference though, because you already hit with both hands as if you are "dual wielding" two weapons. Think of a NIN with two Pamuns. Same thing. You only get the katana skill of that weapon in that particular hand. They don't stack.