Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Player Alhanelem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Bastok
    Posts
    10,123
    Character
    Tahngarthor
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    SMN Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Camate View Post
    Greetings,

    It is working as designed that only the melee accuracy and attack are enhanced when using these rolls. Currently the team does not have any plans to make adjustments to enhance ranged accuracy and attack from these rolls.
    this is a very large extension of one's centrally located finger towards sharpshot automatons. Pet buffs are already rarely utilized as it is, why would they not consider making one of them slightly more worthwhile?
    (9)

  2. #12
    Player dasva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,542
    Character
    Dasva
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    SAM Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Camate View Post
    Greetings,

    It is working as designed that only the melee accuracy and attack are enhanced when using these rolls. Currently the team does not have any plans to make adjustments to enhance ranged accuracy and attack from these rolls.
    You do understand that if that is true your design is fairly flawed right? Most external att buffs including cors give ratt/att. And the cor acc one gives racc too
    (9)

  3. #13
    Player Nakts's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Windurst
    Posts
    98
    Character
    Nakts
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    PUP Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Alhanelem View Post
    this is a very large extension of one's centrally located finger towards sharpshot automatons. Pet buffs are already rarely utilized as it is, why would they not consider making one of them slightly more worthwhile?
    Indeed it is, it's not like we have a lot to work with as is in the way of pet buffs.
    (2)

  4. #14
    Player Olor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,134
    This whole thing and the pet buffing thread being ignored is really grinding my gears.
    (2)
    http://photobucket.com/gallery/http://s19.photobucket.com/user/soulchld4/media/Olorinus-Signature.jpg.html

  5. #15
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    280
    They ever fix companion's roll after I submitted that bug report? Level 96-98 cor's using it gave 30ish hp/tick regen and 25 tp/tick regain on an 11 roll, but a 99 cor using it gave 5 hp and 3 tp for some reason. Because honestly, even if it still gave the old amounts it'd only be useful for PUP's.
    (2)

  6. #16
    Player
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    400
    Quote Originally Posted by Olor View Post
    Can you not ask the development team to examine how often these rolls are (never) used? These rolls are considered a waste because pets are completely useless in any content that requires buffing - so why don't the developers at least consider our suggestion? God knows it won't make the rolls be used more, but examining this issue may expose to the development team (who seems to have missed the memo) that pet jobs are not welcome in hard content.

    Having an entire subset of jobs in the game that are not welcome in the most important content is broken.
    Good point, however, imo, pet rolls will only be used in an all pet party/alliance; otherwise, just insert a non-pet dd in that slot. I believe someone already mentioned this, but removing the "pet" restriction from these buffs and allowing them to hit anything in the party may be more efficient.

    I do not believe this will net bst more invites because our current pets are lackluster dd with horrible ready moves (Even with cor rolls), but it is a step in the right direction. We still need better jugs to fully utilize this; not all monsters are created equal in terms of dd capabilities and bst are dds.
    (1)
    Last edited by WoW; 04-21-2014 at 08:14 AM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2