So, in leveling up RUN a bit I've come to wonder somethin'.. I noticed sword skill is pretty much on par with great sword and, considering the nature of dual wielding, I began to wonder - what if it turns out to be better?
I hit 40 and did some testing with /dnc and with a level 40 Royal Swordsman's blade greatsword vs a pair of swords (level 40/30) the dual wielding seemed to do slightly more damage. But most noticable was that Lunge always did a good 60+ more damage with two runes while dual wielding than it did with a great sword.
I was really hoping that rune fencer would finally be the one job that really brought great swords to the forefront of their arsenal, but considering the high sword rank and how generally good dual wielding is for many jobs, I dunno. I'm a little worried that great swords will just be relegated to the back burner in favor of yet another job being stuck with /nin or /dnc for dual wield access (not to mention needing a provoke and such from someplace, ideally.)
Anyhow, just some thoughts! Like I said, I was certainly hoping Rune Fencer would really hit home with the great sword, but at a glance it seems like dual wield will easily match up, if not surpass, using them. Based on all the concept art and story I'm really pretty surprised by this, all things considered! If rune fencers are supposed to be GS heavy, I don't know why dual wielding would boost lunge damage, not to mention being more reliable anyways than slow infrequent hits.