Multiple magian staves of the same base

[Autymn]

I posted this in the technical support forum too, but I figured if anyone here knew of a way to make this work I'd ask. Is there a way for macros to recognize the difference between a Varuna's staff +3 focusing on damage and a Varuna's Staff +3 focusing on accuracy? I want to get both, but I don't want to waste my time or money going from a +2 to a +3 if the macros won't be able to distinguish and I start using +6 damage on my paralyze spells >.> Anyone know of a solution?

[Lokithor]

I don't think you can get there from here. I think that if you have one equipped and /equip main "same name" that it switches to the one that is currently not equipped but there's no way to have a macro specifically equip one or the other. The best you might be able to do would be to have a macro with just /equip main "Varuna's staff +3" and keep track yourself but that would be maddening.

[Rubicant82]

Autymn you might want to look into getting a mythic staff.

[Vaness]

Pretty much suggest you to make the magic ACC staff a +2 and dont upgrade it to +3.It's the only way it would work.Otherwise it will just pick up the first Varuna staff +3 and equip it no matter what stat is on it.

SE deffinitly need to fix that though and give them different names.

[Alkimi]

If you want a magic accuracy staff I'd recommend just making a Shareeravadi +3 and do the 'MP+115 Magic Accuracy+20' path. It's only equivalent to "Affinity: Magic Accuracy+3" but is still better than HQ lvl 51 staves, will be enough to land spells, and works on all elements.

[Meyi]

Unfortunately there is no way to differentiate between the two. Hopefully at level 99 we'll be given different named staves for the paths, or be allowed to meld them together.

[Arbole]

M.dmg are named differently than M.acc @ 99. Confirmed. I'd only upgrade them for that reason because the only difference from 95 to 99 is -2% casting time... fail

[Zarchery]

No, but what you could do is take one staff up to +2 and the other up to +3. That way they would have distinct names, and really the stat difference between the two is not that great.

[Meyi]

M.dmg are named differently than M.acc @ 99. Confirmed. I'd only upgrade them for that reason because the only difference from 95 to 99 is -2% casting time... fail

Yep.
I = Damage
II = Accuracy
III = Summoning

[ZeroUnlimited]

If you want a magic accuracy staff I'd recommend just making a Shareeravadi +3 and do the 'MP+115 Magic Accuracy+20' path. It's only equivalent to "Affinity: Magic Accuracy+3" but is still better than HQ lvl 51 staves, will be enough to land spells, and works on all elements.

Wrong.

"Affinity: Magic Accuracy +3" is 40 macc and "Affinity: Magic Accuracy +2" is 30 macc. The staff you just recommend has the same macc as the +6 damage staff they are already using, and is worse than level 51 HQ staves.