For the Love of Ninjas....

[Vraelia]

Can we please get Utsusemi: San already?

[Gadwin]

Do we really need San?

[Karumac]

If you do, it will be a 99 merit.

[Avarice]

I'm more concerned with getting Jubaku: Ni back.

[Vraelia]

A lot of people has discussed that San needs to be added. And I'm sure we'll be needing it possibly at 99, you never know.

And while we are on Ninjutsu spells,

I'd like to see Monomi: Ni added. Jubaku: Ni is good too. And Dokumori: Ni, added.

[Mojo]

San does not need to be added and really shouldn't be added after the addition of Iga Kyahan +2. Jubaku: Ni is long overdue. I don't even cast Jubaku: Ichi because the casting time and proc rate are awful.

[Juxtaposition]

Are you really that bad that you need Utsu: San? With Ni at 5 and Ichi at 4, capped Evasion you should only need Ni with Ichi for large no miss strings or after an AoE spell.

[Shadobi]

I would like a Utsusemi: San to absorb "AOE" as well as regular spells just a longer timer to recast.

[Vraelia]

I would like a Utsusemi: San to absorb "AOE" as well as regular spells just a longer timer to recast.

This is what I was wanting San for. I am tired of AoEs destroying shadows. It is actually annoying when you JUST casted a Utsusemi spell, and the mob casts a AoE Spell and take away your Shadows RIGHT after you casted it. I am sure everyone will agree on this, that San would be useful in this case.

[hadeed]

i think NInja has crazy shadows now with Empyrean AF+2 but if they want to give us Utsusemi: San . well make it 1 Shadow that can take AoE magic and can be removed also with normal hit , that will make things interesting lol.

and Utsusemi: San overwrite other shadows .